IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gendispatch] Appealing a non-decision [Possible topic: WG adoption of drafts]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083613A0AFA for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mq5gabAK18Yg for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908233A0911 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id n18so5682509pfa.2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kFphyiXyCKKeDNiI19Sf/lhfYGaKza7I14Eap+DhgWE=; b=qtHJCAPKEwl14z3lJFje2AELOVXW4ApVEUPjeqi4x/3YOxNrntaOmZqrYWu9mdW4wL d0Pgcy7TG31EPF1XoDVdDzoSICQCjmShKaRaKIqkL1hnBA008w+WDrTskP4viCOodQ+u UKLCZ2xlSzTIMtzhHwPSuHT/Xri+QqifUdVdiDlr85qmDw27n2todoXNQZImLoXHMv05 5Eudn9nhFWebwpmX4rPXkHUCoagfLR0txhdPJ1RA3WYxVTztUMUdmTSmARQeOOQ8oSKJ mre8sMxcV/LyWUYsz2uvc09jTbe9wRsBGUAaV+Xhwq2N/yKEB5xACO0kU3Nunw2mUwxT /RHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kFphyiXyCKKeDNiI19Sf/lhfYGaKza7I14Eap+DhgWE=; b=iOoSU7TBknuoZOZgJywNmlolzixx4L96O+KajzqnqluaLw2IXE4z+1rGh413sdtl7c DBrE5++p1njjfbvQHE0kBJ1rNgj6BLkPJdM38zi14WsqvCEvBbIc7N2c3WBWsRP+dvFL KaEHu+iavwfIrJR2RqWkx8Eem0iYDLn2jMKk3mOuzRiR15TDJaApOlhL7dyJXj7n1+hV XmUS1Mv+in+v+qLttypq9qmGKlQYUshi8xmtNLYUxd19LSbM310skXW7wfU+c39Wi0wV +CdCo/1Mbk9/hPpjWLzqYPAKE4qzgIUEm8E/X7mtcSfGJg+owa22Uw5Q9M7aO+XeYDW8 0iPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531E9f620IbGDzLF6PzRreqJxy4VRQWLyI0kbEAJh7jC7kqXGion kNFVPNS+et7DSvYkXmkh8xuBdY5V
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpk4Kq2mNFiMSWAjInRz7La9VRpZ4S0HdTajzfv/lyj7ej0asAmVweRE9/SrK9qGnuTi5xKg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:7d53:: with SMTP id m19mr16137633pgn.168.1590178953739; Fri, 22 May 2020 13:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm7473322pfb.191.2020.05.22.13.22.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 May 2020 13:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <c4bb2691-0c2e-8017-49fc-742d50e9b50f@si6networks.com> <CAKKJt-ds1bVarDo9dHYPerBbKqtmXg=JG7Qw2rZd0LBjP=W17g@mail.gmail.com> <093c8506-4903-770d-45a8-1f2be879f510@si6networks.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fc66fd42-2863-9296-8cdf-7d48a6dd059c@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 08:22:29 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <093c8506-4903-770d-45a8-1f2be879f510@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/JVZprNrwSrun4SV9JQBWmsrOAR0>
Subject: [Gendispatch] Appealing a non-decision [Possible topic: WG adoption of drafts]
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 20:22:36 -0000

On 22-May-20 21:56, Fernando Gont wrote:
...
>> And my understanding is that we can appeal almost anything using the 
>> procedures in RFC 2026, if that's what you're referring to. 
> 
> I guess you can. But how would you e.g. Appeal a non-decision?

I believe that the very first appeal ever was an appeal against
non-action by the IESG. The record seems to be mixed up with a second
appeal by somebody else:
https://www.iab.org/appeals/1995-2/appeal-against-iesg-inaction-by-mr-dave-cocker-mr-w-simpson-appeal-iab-response-february-1995/

2026 actually says that it
"specifies the procedures that shall be followed to deal with
 Internet standards issues that cannot be resolved through the normal
 processes whereby IETF Working Groups and other Internet Standards
 Process participants ordinarily reach consensus."

Not reaching a decision seems like an Internet standards issue to me.

Regards
     Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email