Re: [Gendispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9C01200E9 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:17:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJ9DLKOKtggB for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406B81200C3 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id w11so5483151pga.12 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:17:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vPko5XQ83HPzyFG3gQbEvyaLTr5l9+PRFN6e37kuYBE=; b=GBJ15ApoFpED5sB3s+9qHU8xtPTN+/Xn4/z23TbcTmh9mMFk18dZjUK+sDX4Cpjsn/ JhZpO2Hn2FzPJcwfSNTDOklf5uhdqkNlnlt3ByXByzKzS3V4Od7HzZW0ZCZRmA2sUNFq LrgPkTklUGahkGE8KW1PYKHCAUPXnK0Vqu+GD4LxCarktAS6uyBqOPofJkd3g6Ccw5CX ewJX4Y6ybdqS14vTSxXJZE7mP4+G2oAA6FWHI7npc5jXPmYEhiDEBot873+oz4RxMtJk Dddfccux1bqCSYYtw3zobR6LHukTDOWLytJfiBPFYjLfpqXzh2QsOekH+zoBkXcyQ6lQ 4oQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vPko5XQ83HPzyFG3gQbEvyaLTr5l9+PRFN6e37kuYBE=; b=jMG31odKfK5Zsz+qDkicxSyfhSkoOkhgEdT1VE9WxayxpZnxZWdjsgroranXG3B8gb 2C+BRrw0SzDOUxRnMKzT2JyxQ9BHkXBZNTiUkQ6FFz0dFBSxDSg8YGXco6QX4cPdPX5o nxzJPZD99i6seh8fmzITI2CX+k5f2ICbGF/93MJ+QUoo3WqusaF7fmaXpi3Zm6UVXuaD a88/WpMiO9NnxtfVJ6MOZaEGZ1P29rWZHZw+ggJo/vQzcpnCvbOdt4jpWSJ/mXRl5Rtq jfRlyXvFS7CLTz0l4NLli79EsSfOt4Jdgvltt0CykdfH58xeMJOf9cd1FTna1O5U7mt5 zNmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqkNg/AGPDhTmIUxpS6XwHbCByR3AqIQCZj5c0aiRzoovZ1FJQ n6WQqTDd24oWtkZ9y+flB0ZlVPGV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDHIagrIKKDEsoCPGEJc7lognbSb8X/Q7Z+1EZkgR4BDOgWoY5XKIqsgpALmd8twNfGXRXZg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1914:: with SMTP id 20mr39230390pfz.68.1572999457393; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (8.166.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.166.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm24683222pfr.165.2019.11.05.16.17.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2019 16:17:36 -0800 (PST)
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <157288324460.16605.5041963394720082043@ietfa.amsl.com> <0ac10485-1b45-f034-5dc5-efc7289b7579@joelhalpern.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <41336810-0405-c27b-abe5-cdac827c3a0b@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 13:17:34 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0ac10485-1b45-f034-5dc5-efc7289b7579@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/KU2E8HC0IVSNX5HQDM5IgYuPK2I>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:17:40 -0000

1.

>    The IETF MUST NOT publish RFCs on the IETF stream without IETF rough
>    consensus.

Yes. I think that's become the de facto practice, and it certainly seems
correct.

2. Do we want to start a trend of small updates for single items in
RFC2026, or do we want to start a wider effort? I ask because, if we do
start publishing one-sentence fixes like this one, there are liable
to be a lot of them.

Regards
   Brian

On 05-Nov-19 05:06, Joel Halpern wrote:
> Eric and I have put together a very short draft making a very small 
> update to RFC 2026.   If the chairs consider it useful, I would be happy 
> to stand up for a few minutes to explain why we are proposing this and 
> answer questions.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joel
> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-00.txt
> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 08:00:44 -0800
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
> 
> 
>          Title           : IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough 
> Consensus
>          Authors         : Joel M. Halpern
>                            Eric K. Rescorla
> 	Filename        : draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 4
> 	Date            : 2019-11-04
> 
> Abstract:
>     This document proposes that the IETF never publish any IEtF stream
>     RFCs without IETF rough consensus.  This updates RFC 2026.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-00
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>