IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Thu, 16 December 2021 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8541F3A03EA; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ua_LhMAMB3tu; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EDE3A03EE; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 1BG1XgN6016255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:33:48 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 17:33:42 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20211216013342.GD11486@mit.edu>
References: <163842543502.20877.4835523817199553759@ietfa.amsl.com> <01D32738-3C5B-4EB7-B0CF-33343C187969@episteme.net> <21FE53D5-D4E8-4978-BBCC-92719589EED7@eggert.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21FE53D5-D4E8-4978-BBCC-92719589EED7@eggert.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/KgDRt9_fONVRk0eFhhnpizQqMMI>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 01:34:09 -0000

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 05:26:22PM +0200, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> based on what Pete wrote, my suggestion is to replace:
> 
> > Work related to the IAB, IRTF, and RFC Editor processes is out of scope.
> 
> with
> 
>   Work related to the IAB, IRTF, and RFC  Editor processes are out of scope,
>   but when discussions in GENDISPATCH identify such work items, they can
>   be suggested to those bodies for action.
> 
> Thoughts?

That seems like it would reduce my confusion, and seems reasonable to me.

Thanks,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email