Re: [Gendispatch] Ending ietf@ietf.org <-- the dispatch question

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Wed, 07 April 2021 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDAA3A14CE for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 06:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QyTfAaAJE2pP for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7403A12CE for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B0FDF65838; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:41:23 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x06bTtzEIx2e; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:41:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.27] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3DAADF65809; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 08:41:19 -0500 (CDT)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 08:41:17 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5786)
Message-ID: <AB194BC9-5FFF-4C24-9A4B-EE75A4CD565E@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <F100F5E7-07BF-462D-8349-289312CCADC0@mnot.net>
References: <CAChr6Sxa6uY+nOzWW=MSXP_ekLaBSCTfjC2YcURi+kX0h2X+Rg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB43668B598495DFDD060D33E2B5769@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAChr6SxZY6j+n1ps5C7R3ySePNpRt_9rdE5sB37FRmp6DBBVJA@mail.gmail.com> <3D340A9D-1A39-4ADA-BA27-E4E912CA6D03@akamai.com> <8d9a6f04-4d6d-288a-e901-aa17c42a5886@gmail.com> <CABcZeBM4e3vrNHA1+==n=KamRLwPUSWMgvQsTtVhA_uBaHaBug@mail.gmail.com> <65aec12d-715d-9447-65ae-70b14bbab717@cs.tcd.ie> <CAChr6SxYWW5CpY5t=ZD+xg+wH=YH5_nu+L_8dpP7_p+dED-ggA@mail.gmail.com> <2dfc430a-be5c-507d-1f63-9df7f71c9588@cs.tcd.ie> <F100F5E7-07BF-462D-8349-289312CCADC0@mnot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_64EA0EF4-F402-4424-A3CC-87B86043CE68_="
Embedded-HTML: [{"plain":[274, 76], "uuid":"98DB9004-E9D0-44E4-8251-F5460A05BA81"}]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/MhClRS-RB26Uwwp6KMNJx-z2J-U>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Ending ietf@ietf.org <-- the dispatch question
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 13:41:30 -0000

On 6 Apr 2021, at 19:23, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> I'd observe that last-call@ was introduced by the IESG after community 
> consultation. Is that a potential path for dispatch -- i.e., saying 
> "IESG, you might want to look at this..."?

Yep, that's on the list in the charter:

- Requesting that the the IESG or the IETF LLC consider taking up the 
work.

Nonetheless, I think the IESG would appreciate a draft to look at.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best