IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 13 February 2021 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3E3A0E2E for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:49:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8CU-PVCHCpU for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899F53A0E2A for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCB5BF38; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:49:31 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HyiL60XK7JU; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:49:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.119] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F0A0BF37; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:49:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1613234969; bh=GWgeBgcicBsZug3okZPfqbCNNbL8pluWp07h7+tOhxs=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xp0NivHdmofL5WhJ6XqARExfXq84rWwT75d1piSWEprLVscxpVeeg67qRPGQFNyso d42YiTODiMZNnjX60JLDUNSWH/jhuajqNBvSugn6M+mn8fKbkHrrtTQx+7JfigIdtX 9eR1Ey6sbvidLOb1vbNTZJOA2E5T7bQ70OVQbIEY=
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>
Cc: "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <20210212205351.27E4B6DDB49D@ary.qy> <3b4ea13c-0743-c882-7fc0-1fe7288f6d07@gont.com.ar> <a2e6c65e-076a-8875-c374-56c825105a6c@cs.tcd.ie> <CAGVFjM+sgyRDhuVYvkPC1XbH4yL-Q_Qpbs_naZpS3D3ApPO92A@mail.gmail.com> <1799272646.5561.1613213835213@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <6aaecc62-e892-af0a-aa5b-a5c436a0b9bc@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:49:28 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1799272646.5561.1613213835213@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VpvGk2ezr4pCaVIeae7QxAeXvvIxjWdoi"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/OmSXtwXiQLEX9MUbWZe8NQtLKpM>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 16:49:43 -0000


On 13/02/2021 10:57, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> I would however create a single WG that can deal with all
> diversity-related issues; there, people that want to work on a
> specific problem, including language, can find a home for their
> drafts. 
-1 - I don't think that'd work for quite a few reasons.

The IETF works better when we tackle more focussed problems.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email