IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Mon, 06 September 2021 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23883A1DCC for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id llFNfCA8HKzg for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B703A1DC6 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 20:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id v16so5513925ilo.10 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yHesQQfOCfZ1aJTTSbO0IwZAkJaNsTXC2Q+UQ3XzEaY=; b=bYHiGsY17F1TxaI31dra7RE7nFKleu6Q4BRkbllaEzYm2on33ECoolzroTDnjvSuoX PJoZqoXJak4146KvY5plFDcph3ptJ+QBYZQqB5XphSjPpFLcCHTSAWyRF1s7yCgDVC41 deetrlrH9015ZV7Xvaly1r3VP0FXDH/cdEAZmBXRGmmD9VXAgfFJ8kQ4g8aobjNEGkLe v4TrHFPkUNIsh1EIU+0u/Txt02tzXp4QpD+d1p2oqXlGIDiIBYY9qNW1+Wc9HHMIUoqf M8IpXgLOSSEJ7pmNwH8pE1rghlsDa1Xf6CAcfZen5mjdsE/p/RK0FhbUMABMbEJoBuBj 712g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yHesQQfOCfZ1aJTTSbO0IwZAkJaNsTXC2Q+UQ3XzEaY=; b=joL2anRyxfxK5z4iABGY4x2j7eQflj5a3Zi1yOK5KHB+PqHG50FkzaRyrsFBamVCDh Rc+KzhZ7UtnLGGJkRqQLGhluJcZutTU/Icjd/AtObqZiCsq8dno7S3w6b9Y5So5YGbU4 FKiiz/Bp4l6OZlDRgs+g/0isFUR3AShScVypyATZOLSwEReNJo19KRxB9b6WEJDIYcuL Nh54930CtG+WY7//2DGACduutP+oxE1u4ecFEOmJS73bShVuO1XdOxI22InnzMvcsM6D gD1EaPTPkAvqI131fbydGr4gFje+C/iVB43L+iFSS+OWMqJkrZehuGKii2F40Mwt3K0H YX1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300kmGDkQwVBnZ/Tvki2jzrppEX3p5YuLJN/7jYr9eIZrqeehma D0J0VEQesv1wSb2nkEYNJ+4ohAcnmMO8rnIQ+zM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyg+1f0tLeiPzAe5kIOXjBgsGkrOJuomCBM8EeGVIlBvvcZUuI9hg4aXBLSrZ+OLqx54jwyaxOUIkLJjc6/W1Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:194c:: with SMTP id x12mr6687393ilu.155.1630899862098; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163037412640.15437.266878243771416247@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAChr6SztfuauB1vTLpu6L-AeaShRfZ-Ybs_d+2p8oaMBBvKjyQ@mail.gmail.com> <f706ce7f-2967-50ad-eaf0-e9b168b5a6e8@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw+KVW_Jq5LZFN_KJ9ygxb9=sFoRNs2yAPeiPLV3A1Y=w@mail.gmail.com> <9b819b2d-4de2-800d-190c-4c7cbfc2465e@gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy_F6yg2UGC_LSBvpMQr25bwH=CUq9jh78_h13iyyh9yg@mail.gmail.com> <7da21d8a-bdc1-6974-c485-9ed1b2e4910a@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SxzYCC=eYySGuAeHY6=pXcAR+sBvAR7iuqTqcDwitb4LA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sy3=xWWejpPrmMRSgE18CNVs29NtxzJfv_nm55oXq215g@mail.gmail.com> <a508dcfb-26f6-89f2-4ef3-a7befe9db95a@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SzFb0dPiMjysknHfBMk1__HRPb463bLCveJQq=fmpOKZQ@mail.gmail.com> <53004065-59f5-d95c-a95a-3c0d1af0f0e1@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6SwdOKkkY2rtR5c-zxtojzpkiPwsQco2tKgJtqdxgTsfZQ@mail.gmail.com> <1412729120.4105523.1630889467040@mail.yahoo.com> <CAChr6SzyYtL5CfR1eGRdGSr-huzNt+MvdHU8DjrJ2dV03gJK5g@mail.gmail.com> <0796b433-24da-bc2f-d917-4f771a6c2748@joelhalpern.com> <CAChr6Sx2ycBW+JTxUwzvTif1VYdJZiQ8LR9mLLEqjE-Sd-ueHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Szi-2B+r5Ere7pUntmk4eFWZtU_cT-mM--dvxR+j=s7qQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Szi-2B+r5Ere7pUntmk4eFWZtU_cT-mM--dvxR+j=s7qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2021 20:44:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwENC3dP30MWHCtLtuckjr303CQ3tnXD+OZ8Pg1WN_E4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f1d94a05cb4b761c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/SokOJeBafs2UPqx8jy1pRQNnCEw>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 03:44:30 -0000

It looks like there are a bunch of other heated responses here.

Joel addressed some things that were incorrect concerning affiliation in my
statements, off-list, and that I appreciate that he didn't try to use those
mistakes to argue in public.

I still think that my descriptive text on this topic is a better way to go.

thanks,
Rob

On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 6:49 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, are "the lawyers" saying that a Cisco employee's draft here is totally
> ok to be AD-approved (by someone that works for Ericsson).
>
> Joel, please do not answer, and instead let coauthors "B. Biddle" or "Jay
> Daley" respond.
>
> This draft seems like a really bad idea! I agree that it's ok to sketch
> out the landscape for people completely new to the issues, but I do not see
> why there is reason to cling to the way it's drafted now.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 6:34 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 6:30 PM Joel Halpern Direct <
>> jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On the question of whether discussing compensation is an antitrust
>>> issue, I defer to the lawyers.
>>>
>>
>> That statement doesn't mean much if the lawyers don't write anything, and
>> it borders on a lie if they don't.
>>
>> Again, I would suggest going with my text...
>>
>> thanks,
>> Rob
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email