IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gendispatch] Re: Archival Dysfunction

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2024 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97208C151072 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PW5XTzc53Rh for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37B0AC151552 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-58ef19aa6c4so1414352a12.2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720716633; x=1721321433; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+ApEHRu9zemKR2WYlaZ4vUdZOp9yhXTkxmrY0HvqDe4=; b=FQNjoh3o+5Z1EWpsPr6mzkNSnNMTiacHpmH0kHg69kuDN56rM0u4NEKQbVdls9dIR9 B6tn6tj3wSJ0q10nqaQxesff/UtJG0EKDps1a4USXwzsLXXJiNaHEG1uqrg6jQX8Uuz3 t6Nx8bWiEalExwlgjkOvh5wPQLipTPHEs0RMqc1pkeUn6DSVXgZkbEPIgV2VAbXwb4dT xWO23+1jr3xUY/NZ0BIWYOR3UZw2CYGpdL99ZCfPCS9rHX5mKfr4TNJ3cGHKrJVDn0YV qdxHA7lkdkz4M4xo7QyXKCpXNDxNOTgD0GruEy/EuE2q8cJDq/co9XeESTE4/L8hKym6 bwhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720716633; x=1721321433; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+ApEHRu9zemKR2WYlaZ4vUdZOp9yhXTkxmrY0HvqDe4=; b=iT9Oh/J5YaEAu4CP4n01VzjpjY3+c4/1XfYGULLtr0pyHZVR6T6AVccpQFKpaBSqTq 5DEhm1Mdr/9w7SEt1rWwR0uHL8IyJ4aE28eggvNUe+KHe/WlE13aMHB3vx08XfcIXJ1b d9awnDdRMMS+YSAmod0/QlVXjm66SdmZkYHVw8Ga7daXjT70tphPSJCBb6kXAvbsEudx PCozjWgCFjhZLhlY07qI1TL38zBHE2ULZI2JbHJp5C9AuQTrR2X3CEcwqYcMp8Sep6Fr HK+2NJ9XR+XeOupwwG8kZsOui81IFQWc4j1boJFgT8vnF9QUvKCBAOBHFUM1Fe4QASL6 EnIA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjaEBHey7fOP9/srk3RzS1a+QJGLAhSQBESt3oMsdnRuSY6ONBwr5TwBd8j0cBtRvb+275Xay+PhBkdC/N+4RNhRBnUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzmnjAy7lp+hgXmzXINtwG//9lQjHxco7wLdytcoo79ruGY68pO yPCe/lDFuIR2YQqPS+ezis5P8UrR1oPdZ9pYIlUDUjblmfD4l+RyN3+tQRPwDBhouUnz8o6ID++ ISP901lWfwhx/KrQfzqTrZDxEVgk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFSWxLsXpkjoAZRpOMM/Y0DOl0vyBFDSJGrPmReAzhPDIP0uBx6va06YXFIF5p2e7Gb/M99Yxr+5uZX0qIm2lM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3402:b0:a77:b5c2:399 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a780b6b2013mr583068766b.31.1720716633355; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <9442CCBF-EDF4-4FD7-AFBA-29EA301FB3DA@akamai.com> <4c00d259-653f-43d1-973e-2f9d38876585@gmail.com> <LV8PR11MB85368D25E41B14A968638AD6B5A42@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DE8F40AE-8F7E-479C-B4FC-C2CB6929581D@brianrosen.net> <BYAPR05MB53183DC5B81AF7C757932DF0AEA42@BYAPR05MB5318.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAPDSy+4GNt3aXkd2McYEo5U47wM=szrCYfk3-g=ijDMvviOjEg@mail.gmail.com> <9997553d-15e2-4a44-849a-67345fa55fd8@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <9997553d-15e2-4a44-849a-67345fa55fd8@cs.tcd.ie>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:50:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+529fQj=J9=920fapZQe8n1hLeKZj4Gv9_qGBmw=eX5WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b0b9fd061cfb8fd1"
Message-ID-Hash: WZGN7ODM5XWTM2GVNSRXK2FNKHLRCDLW
X-Message-ID-Hash: WZGN7ODM5XWTM2GVNSRXK2FNKHLRCDLW
X-MailFrom: dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>, Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: Archival Dysfunction
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/Tqzgu-iYDwlu5qtHF1ymVIv1Fdw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>

By GitHub I mainly meant "move the process minutiae to something that
doesn't take years to update". GitHub happens to be my favorite such
solution, but we can instead use tools from the previous century if we
think that's best for some reason :-)
David

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 1:50 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 10/07/2024 17:12, David Schinazi wrote:
> > the day-to-day minutiae can move to GitHub
>
> That'd be an escalation in githubbery. IIUC at the moment,
> individual WGs decide to use github or not and if so, how.
> Requiring a GH a/c to access/comment on process minutiae,
> or being significantly disadvantaged though not having such
> an a/c would be a significant enough change.
>
> S.
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status