[Gendispatch] 2026bis and 2418bis

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 10 October 2024 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CECAC1E640E for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVjiYqnIh_hT for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.127]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684F3C151084 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0409410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0409410.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49AHd5u8022711 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:06:41 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to; s= jan2016.eng; bh=75u8yNIZQfM+tEmpI7c5lznf54kevcY8nG6/st1NJ7k=; b= Csjt0Z/Qxn6tUDe60kfxuWCh6xA7UCelGvQfZ2XjbB6Ba0JRlE3XsSSwfoVUS4oW O65XEbm+c6tIL86KmBcmHmZt9GU5rEvx9TRn619oQjAimoqj1hypy5RXAD22BS6a pHCa7MJAI0ByibcJwRj02tV8lkrbWn2LQQsXdBIMXkR2yoTXQPWKCWrSRJt5YYoc 1pgV0c6YeXd4+5U6Aa3OmlRtmdzkeCG4Rd6uI3sRzQoONmWlnNGboHuLxGSE7+hv OtW7/xvH5Eo6j8oapcdOllW6aSCyN0F0isQ9+XZjWcyhJstVJXQfrQ4Qe+4tisz4 uQIhSVd1ZXkau9gDzrWxTg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by m0409410.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 426ce7krja-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:06:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49AIHQSe026362 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:06:40 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.205]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4230swp5qd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:06:40 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:06:40 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 12:06:40 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: 2026bis and 2418bis
Thread-Index: AQHbG0eJRTiSoE1ZKkyvsPFnom8W1A==
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:06:40 +0000
Message-ID: <196B2599-0BCA-47E3-8141-4ACC91C881CB@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.89.24091630
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_196B25990BCA47E381414ACC91C881CBakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-10_13,2024-10-10_01,2024-09-30_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=619 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410100126
X-Proofpoint-GUID: PqZrbWmuKHtcoAUQqLSzt_PgyRUoKcU6
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: PqZrbWmuKHtcoAUQqLSzt_PgyRUoKcU6
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-06_09,2024-09-06_01,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=435 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410100125
Message-ID-Hash: VSQKZCARFRQBN53DFUCWUPGSUGXWC5MU
X-Message-ID-Hash: VSQKZCARFRQBN53DFUCWUPGSUGXWC5MU
X-MailFrom: rsalz@akamai.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] 2026bis and 2418bis
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/UPB13r77W-xN6L0ZbwXhFa6Vphg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>

I just posted the “final” versions of draft-rsalz-2026bis and draft-rsalz-2418bis.

The big change is that all errata have now been addressed. (So, Rob, to answer your question, these are now “good to go” as far as the authors are concerned.)

Please take a look.