Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 14/06/2023 00:04, Joel Halpern wrote:
> Looking at the draft, I was struck that it goes to some trouble to make 
> clear that if policy folks are to participate effectively, they need to 
> also understand the technology. 

Interesting. I didn't quite take the same message from the
draft. But in any case, I don't think understanding is in
itself enough to effectively participate in a piece of IETF
work, I'd say one really needs to be involved in the work and
not parachute in late on, at least in many cases. (Yes, I'm
ignoring things like directorate reviews/IETF-LC there but I
hope you get what I mean.)

> The point I take away from that is that 
> the obligation is on both sides, both the policy-oriented participant 
> and the community, to help make that education happen.

Yep, I agree with that.

> Having said taht, I have trouble figuring out what to do with the 
> draft.  Not clear how or where it can usefully progress, for all that I 
> found it interesting and informative in pulling together disparate aspects.

Ditto.

Cheers,
S.

> 
> Yours,
> 
> Joel
> 
> On 6/13/2023 6:46 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> I just read the draft and recalling the discussion at
>> IETF-116 I fear that a message that I heard being sent from
>> the mic line perhaps hasn't landed.
>>
>> In particular, I think a number of people said that the best
>> way to ensure your favourite policy topics are considered in
>> IETF work is to have someone who is playing a full and
>> constructive part in that IETF work be familiar with your
>> favourite policy issues. Liaising, co-ordinating and setting
>> up new bodies will be nowhere near as effective.
>>
>> Yes, that's expensive (in time), but so is being involved in
>> IETF work, so that seems fair to me fwiw.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> S.
>>
>> On 13/06/2023 16:31, Stacie Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Many thanks to those of you who provided feedback to us on the Policy
>>> Experts are IETF Stakeholders draft at the 116 Gen Dispatch meeting.
>>>
>>> We have uploaded a new version (see below), which we are preparing 
>>> for the
>>> 117 meeting and welcome further input or ideas on how to refine our 
>>> problem
>>> statement or scope potential solutions. In particular, we would welcome
>>> specific examples of how and where policy input is working well, and
>>> thoughts on a ‘landing space’ or next steps for this work.
>>>
>>> Please reach out to the authors directly with comments or suggestions.
>>>
>>> Also, if anyone is interested in reviewing or contributing to this 
>>> document
>>> please let us know. It would be great to work with others on this.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Stacie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: <[e-mail]>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:42
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>> draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt
>>> To: Marek Blachut <[e-mail]>, Stacie Hoffmann <
>>> [e-mail]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A new version of I-D, 
>>> draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Marek Blachut and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Name:           draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders
>>> Revision:       01
>>> Title:          Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
>>> Document date:  2023-06-13
>>> Group:          Individual Submission
>>> Pages:          11
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt
>>> Status:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders/
>>> Html:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.html
>>> Htmlized:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders
>>> Diff:
>>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>     The IETF’s work has significance for wider societal, economic, and
>>>     political communities, though gaps and barriers to engagement with
>>>     the IETF exist for policy experts.  This informational draft
>>>     introduces a problem statement and gap analysis of existing
>>>     initiatives related to policy expert engagement in the IETF.  It 
>>> also
>>>     poses questions we hope to work through with others in the IETF
>>>     community regarding how to better enable policy expert engagement in
>>>     IETF standardisation, and on how we can build a culture which better
>>>     supports technical and policy experts working together to develop
>>>     more robust standards.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>