[Gendispatch] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 01 December 2021 11:03 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org, gendispatch@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <163835660760.16598.13673275377460089178@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 03:03:28 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/VJU7E0HH05qkSZHrJsFEYYutpSk>
Subject: [Gendispatch] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-gendispatch-01-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-gendispatch/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I question whether AD sponsored documents should be discussed on the IETF
discussion mailing list, or whether it would be better for those discussions to
continue on the Gendispatch mailing (or an alternative open small mailing
list)?  It is certainly possible that some individuals who may be interested in
participating in these drafts are subscribed to Gendispatch but choose not to
be subscribed to the IETF discussion mailing list.

[Gendispatch] Robert Wilton's No Objection on cha… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Re: [Gendispatch] Robert Wilton's No Objection on… Pete Resnick
Re: [Gendispatch] Robert Wilton's No Objection on… Lars Eggert