IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-thomson-gendispatch-rfc-derivatives-00.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Thu, 28 September 2023 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F6FC151536 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jEtbzddVgGq for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A59FCC14F721 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1695917659; bh=yh7ah3Jsy9ZAuQEnyjlYnBd5pu4Ufp/jA9wqYJcwgM4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=rzPwTPCZvQ3NxhBltRGP9f4rLS/zT3N1hpf90gSyELEzJPax4CxRv4Su8gQrcufnX 3ouoT3veEHeHr3dSZaNGF8njnh4UxH+MQlTImd0xognO9zv8J0s+SksOD+yYXvI7Pc m3CBJVRVQe6zA41l9xqEl5eqnkTwQNlxioie2070=
Received: from [10.61.156.34] ([173.38.220.46]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22ubuntu3) with ESMTPSA id 38SGEIoA3339908 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:14:19 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4HMcPM48V0CcHfw5yzr8scQd"
Message-ID: <b2d1c188-14bc-b354-a5d1-e5d8999087c3@lear.ch>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:14:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
References: <169587871859.41935.17692726615817157868@ietfa.amsl.com> <3c7a5635-6a18-445e-9483-22ebfe31e1d5@betaapp.fastmail.com> <a970d95a-fbdc-8271-bbbc-889de7c6ac87@joelhalpern.com> <CABcZeBNgdb4ZtEqVeG6D=H617UrHG9SgktmZaLG_TjKZFMVvZg@mail.gmail.com> <459e63b6-ff7b-fb85-7e44-0ada8940d7c6@lear.ch> <CABcZeBPRJL8UAdxwSzH3woRxx=1A5T1MfBjqOiZD3cXf1XBF0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPRJL8UAdxwSzH3woRxx=1A5T1MfBjqOiZD3cXf1XBF0g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/VeSvS0bAmFwPmNaVfjiEnABwNF4>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-thomson-gendispatch-rfc-derivatives-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:14:28 -0000

On 28.09.2023 18:08, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> If you are referring to eTS, I do not believe that this is what 
> happened, as I said, ETSI was not using the TLS spec, but rather was 
> effectively publishing an extension draft.

Ok, but copying actually happened in other cases, tho perhaps not with ETSI.

Eliot

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status