IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] revised

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 23 February 2021 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CABA3A281C for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:12:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.57, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sROBlkN47oVO for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DC43A0A02 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 07:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11NExS4M027424; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:12:43 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=gqJ9PTUVraFK1+RO5ECYNESFW8VSWKQV4cSLdPH9y5g=; b=g9dO1dc/9s3Qfa2+Bpqe6EPWFAvXjN+c/UjR+tMZbOLxDVNYhE7xiMxuGsbovsfllPG7 +vPQzQz6vjDXi5RtJIOXiJ1tloynTWPpmGYRtp5qWRExuezhlHH8TRgJ0wc+byOqfRo4 hWINpzQhQXO9XowE4ca/uZPG3+vggcgrWIOPWiyOrPXbn1ZxSC7dyJVEl2L/m1SR7CxP whW6HfGA2bAoFkLF1n1S3srd8QpTeVLvcGgcI1Edi+DH3XbnS4G0SX9sdakJQUBu2c6F K+SQMpW9m0a1+vN4JminnoPvPzM7lUUskrn0nLyxMg8B8Xve1zfw1EMRhnVUANICQB1o Jw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 36trcrr2xa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:12:43 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 11NF4tTc019299; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:12:42 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 36txn42f87-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:12:42 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:12:42 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:12:41 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Gendispatch] revised
Thread-Index: AQHXCX1nmxtwuF+QWE2w+oZQpaX5qapmJcAA///ErwA=
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:12:41 +0000
Message-ID: <E929EAEC-99AD-486F-A110-FE32CA83964B@akamai.com>
References: <A531C377-33A4-4138-BE28-788FF5FE267E@sn3rd.com> <6F387137-46E4-4CDE-9BCA-CAED684D3AA1@sn3rd.com> <32149fda-1d17-c167-1699-43ed3c02f516@si6networks.com> <f0f31d9c-cdd5-ccf7-3524-f243afe7bd8e@lounge.org>
In-Reply-To: <f0f31d9c-cdd5-ccf7-3524-f243afe7bd8e@lounge.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.46.21021202
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <97E7055626EA414D816D2E705B086DF3@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-23_08:2021-02-23, 2021-02-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=928 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102230129
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-02-23_08:2021-02-23, 2021-02-23 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=849 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102230129
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.33) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/WcxA0GNVPVgEZNpGJ7-DAPIHh_0>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] revised
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:12:48 -0000

>  There seems to be a desire to have the group focus
    (first/primarily?) on race as the single axis in which to discuss diversity
    and inclusiveness, e.g. [1]-- and that would be very divisive and 
    destructive.


Why do you think it would be destructive, as opposed to a first step because some think it is easier to handle?

--
"You don't have to turn this into something. It doesn't have to upset you." Marcus Aurelius

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email