[Gendispatch] Let's restore and evolve our plenary function (Re: Ending ietf@ietf.org)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 03 April 2021 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D82C3A148E for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 09:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXT5U5gQC2zd for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 09:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46F223A1487 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 09:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1617468898; x=1618678498; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=dyn8Kd6iNaTaJM6STDJjo9QxkIuAU687LdygJLpxazU=; b=mGy3SGpaJabTqGH+wVKQDSDZ0gPdtJF13EM1GtpzfHdm9Vmjj6dZtPeW KaUz9rRV2fq9SowZQf3BGRGOUBZzY4vIvu9mDGmQuIIkzG19t5gum0IWi tSyObqcRslfl4WyDHo8uLiOCSb4DRyfH1RSujLUh7ck/su4PHorv0bPSD I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0ATAAC3nGhglxbLJq1aGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAYIBAwEBAQsBg3cBJxIxhEKJBIhLA5xhBAcBAQEKAwEBNAQBAYRQAoF9JjcGDgIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBBQBAQEBAQEBAWiFXYZFAQICASNWBQsZNAICVwYTFIJdAYJmIalWd4EygQGEWIR8EIE5AYFSi3lDgguBOgwQgil0h1c1gisEgkYXbAeBUGtbD51FnQKDFIM6gUWLfYt6Ax+UKpBEGYYlHax6YwGEAQIEBgUCFoFqIoFbMxoIGxU7KgGCPj4SGQ6OOB4YjXw/Ay84AgYBCQEBAwmOaAEB
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:Z7wiGq7gVdkagVx7wQPXwErXdLJzesId70hD6mlaQ3VuA6+lvu qpm+kW0gKxtSYJVBgb9eyoFaGcTRrnlKJdzpIWOd6ZNjXOmGztF4166Jun/juIIU3D38pQz7 1pfaQ7KNCYNzVHpOL75AX9LNo62tmA98mT6tv29HtmQQF0Z6wI1W4QYTqzKUF4SBJLApA0Dv Onl696jgC9cncaZNnTPBc4dtXEzue79q7OUFojDx4j5BLmt0LN1JfKVz6FwxwZTzRDhZAl/G StqX2e2oyT99em1xTby2jfq65zpeKk4N5CCMuQ4/JlTQnRtg==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,302,1610409600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="34675268"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Apr 2021 16:54:53 +0000
Received: from [10.61.144.99] ([10.61.144.99]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 133GsqYZ017664 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 3 Apr 2021 16:54:53 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <94D04C28-AFE8-4969-BF01-27EC68B19FDB@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_18CEBC19-06EF-40B9-9775-4DC5FC319C08"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 18:54:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nXiw99gwZ754+hBZ65CD07QVGF3evkT71iWk5_F+qsm5A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
References: <CAChr6Sxa6uY+nOzWW=MSXP_ekLaBSCTfjC2YcURi+kX0h2X+Rg@mail.gmail.com> <1CBE5840-3CAE-4EAA-9CF2-E0FFDAAAA6FD@akamai.com> <b5166f9c-f79d-1e45-1e6f-a12e90ce3aa5@cs.tcd.ie> <CAJU8_nXiw99gwZ754+hBZ65CD07QVGF3evkT71iWk5_F+qsm5A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.144.99, [10.61.144.99]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/ZeWsiEgDfIBNaN_IiLSrLdM0chw>
Subject: [Gendispatch] Let's restore and evolve our plenary function (Re: Ending ietf@ietf.org)
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 16:55:10 -0000

Hi Kyle,

> I don't have the long history of IETF involvement that you do, but knowing many of the old-timers I am not at all surprised.


Since I’ve been part of the party since 1988, I think it’s time for a change.  But I would rather it not be hasty (I feel one of Tolkien’s Ents saying that).

Opportunity for all to express a point of view is important in order to produce the best work, but the IETF list has the added challenge of being quite general and cross-cutting in nature, and that means that things tend to meander into the weeds.

Simply shutting down the IETF list, however, leaves us less of a community.  We need to figure out how to evolve a plenary function, and we should be thinking about all the modalities and tooling available to us.

Rather than view this as a complete negative, I suggest that we take this as a challenge to find an industry-leading way to improve overall decision making and discourse in an environment where rough consensus matters, without us getting too… rough.

Let’s not just allow for new possibilities here; let’s seek them.

Eliot