IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 15 February 2021 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CD83A0F46 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:44:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=sFe/2UQR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=eqA2i/SY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id npJl-Tc2qUqg for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10BFB3A0F41 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0398F5C010D; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:44:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:44:06 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=5 B3h59VcdG+qAcoYw0RGWbp73+WHszRP/bIyVHxgf4w=; b=sFe/2UQRs9MQyVmmN r2qLEE3Xr/6hJfCx/oBKpk6CT/ZfCjakFZ+GCNhQfaSu4zNCo2GxlvRHzZKCEDFl XYzzRrr96xqM8Tt0c+/6u6Mv0Wo3y4Fbxp8i/sQf9shrm9i+2SLuSZfoNRsiNPns 1Ti7AQTmwaUeWn4Wj8BPGHRMs72ByLnUrlzCLNM8pPDPMk5dH3tz9NhD8b9XJQK0 +2vPzn6I3JqX6NXImG1P+vg1fv/tp9c5ArsGGW0CxElBqV4fdDACHQbO64fOCpQF HovjRhiqEl2ZajZWSdQxgWjMPin/VnFZcHn8xGaxQfTkzIUvFWPGP8ndL1zgARHm mu8gQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=5B3h59VcdG+qAcoYw0RGWbp73+WHszRP/bIyVHxgf 4w=; b=eqA2i/SYhm5kkCI00fpqexROpJ3rvBeHdcwrkQtS31yjYWtP/vK1WrLU6 cpIPHcG4v6XxAIDTGl7KHk3LIYhe92MCFQmty/aZJDcUPd7Rv0DZkWACz4rwb6LG u4F14dsOO28g3RRAHZ6g/WLDFSSsKMMI5aW/Go7JXcKtPFgRn/qVgpLEuhALsufI S9N2LnXcHFC3KWQmVfT7f0YrvrZnxw/Wy1dRVzbKJFRKplBPFb25r7qTpQ/tNCPr dGn6/eBCj5pNb+kiep37yMdqGfTmIWrxlJeW9YcblT5gOzUeEMoGhHAEBuU0y1UP SYtiUx2SThnARL9LfAGSlG4kQStGA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:9cAqYHM3SM6O8La4ceXWY870Stg0xxCzrJDGKVpm66C_tJjv9vmHjg> <xme:9cAqYB5vCvdQW6lfWUL_Yv5ll5zobVUNv4F9XDT9X5G0nuWujrMOePT8TCEo3_7lQ -tNOEcBG-rzNsQU-Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrieekgdduudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeefudfhgfetgfetvddvffeiuddtkeffgedvjeejtdeiheefgfelfeeutdel vdfggfenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedrudduje drieehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep rghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:9cAqYDI5E6TIkyXAImYkZEzUKYCVhARxCFdtPI6XKheuarkhtX0CsA> <xmx:9cAqYDczVflc6o5nsqhcw7yeh6BrvnFMFcAa_xPQB42Kb7tuU4qoVg> <xmx:9cAqYOdB_awstDg8132swUb7jRPnf-hmn1kDmIJvJpDqLh5cdm7hYA> <xmx:9cAqYLESV-ZJP912H3Na0XLH4HJCr-9D5W3Wn7LzHSJvZDCZyquf_g>
Received: from rtp-vpn3-175.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.65]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 561A8240065; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:44:05 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <120cbf69-f901-1ddc-1864-006b22fb9c81@network-heretics.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:44:04 -0500
Cc: gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <616008F4-9030-442D-8BC4-8B829874983F@cooperw.in>
References: <A531C377-33A4-4138-BE28-788FF5FE267E@sn3rd.com> <9ED61E90-CC72-431B-BB41-7801262A75AC@cooperw.in> <BB601F16-71AC-4658-BEC2-F89C0D87D0FE@cooperw.in> <120cbf69-f901-1ddc-1864-006b22fb9c81@network-heretics.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/_B1IpgubaZVtHlO-1BUYv_-TKGs>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:44:08 -0000

Hi Keith,

> On Feb 15, 2021, at 12:20 PM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2/15/21 10:35 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> 
>> (1) There were several documents proposed on this topic last year and in previous years. The GENDISPATCH process was run, including two virtual interim meetings focused specifically on this topic, and the result of that process was rough consensus to have a quick-spin WG to produce an informational document on this topic [1]. Re-hashing the dispatch discussion is not useful.
> 
> Just for clarification, are you saying that this WG is a done deal and that the normal community review of a new WG will be skipped in this case?

No.

Alissa

> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gendispatch mailing list
> Gendispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email