Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-where-does-that-come-from-00.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 12 March 2021 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82A73A105C for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:09:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjaTvd0ZYZpE for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1823A105B for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 06:09:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4056; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1615558180; x=1616767780; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=FnRLamCoxtgxnArj1bYBQjkxuQOFnZa9lBcN5hRibyA=; b=nA1NR+5mA/X+7AjgDWWqlrYH7sfHpnfeNn0zNWrbIRVROwUPFBe3zCRy 7HSVE5iPN30q8EyHVrVde64RLX8aIWkWlkLddkfCVIqu7rYAe9JGOzsaf 9GHMgEWgoF2fzvO/4acIT9tuNCZGi9JWKg2h5254nLvLmkuMqnch7+LD6 k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAADZdEtgjBbLJq1aGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAgIBAQEBgXsFAQEBAQsBgSKCVAEnEjGEQYgkYIgbJQOHdIxChiOBfAQHA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBCgMBATQEAQGETQKBdSY0CQ4CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBBQBAQEBh?= =?us-ascii?q?keGRAEBAQECASNUAgULCwQUKgICVwYTgnABgmYhq3d2gTKFWIRtEIE5AYFSh?= =?us-ascii?q?SoBhkVCggyBOAwQglg+gmAEhHM0gisEgl1RQySBPA2BF50OnGSDC4MzgT+XR?= =?us-ascii?q?QMfk26QIrJ6TwGDdgIEBgUCFoFUOIFZMxoIGxVlAYI+PhIZDY44HY4TQAMvA?= =?us-ascii?q?jYCBgEJAQEDCZQAAQE?=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:NsODyKGaeawOU3SwpLqEaseALOonbusQ8zAX/mp6ICYlEfCwvc aogfgdyFvImC8cMUtNpfmsMLSNKEm8ybdb+o8UVI3JYCDHvy+SIJhm/c/exVTbexHW0uJGz6 9vf+xfBbTLYGRSqcb/7E2GH807wN+BmZrGuc7kw31gTR5nZshbhm8TNi+hHkJ7XwVAD5Yifa Dsg/ZvnSaqengcc62AaEUtYu6rnayoqLvWJToPBxsq82C1/FeVwY+/NQSE1REDVD4K5rEu/Q H+4mrEz5Tmle2nwRnB0GKW1bBqoZ/Kz9tOA9HksLlzFgnR
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,243,1610409600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="34137032"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 12 Mar 2021 14:09:35 +0000
Received: from [10.61.144.47] ([10.61.144.47]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 12CE9YqK011542 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:09:35 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <F6F761B3-40B9-479C-8991-8D252992BFF7@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B53F607F-9A38-4018-ACF1-2EAD0A2ED20A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:09:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4366BA1ADCDA58908980C8B4B56F9@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <161551347345.9380.1240690555706841290@ietfa.amsl.com> <2BDF7CD7-F5C5-4A27-9A2F-B40311A1851B@mnot.net> <MN2PR11MB4366BA1ADCDA58908980C8B4B56F9@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.144.47, [10.61.144.47]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/aSeEolTg1zhFQieJ9S8yaPtC09U>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-where-does-that-come-from-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:09:42 -0000

Hi Rob,

> On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:56, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I’m not sure that I have a good suggestion as to where this is dispatched, but one question is whether this work has any overlap with the discussions in RFCed-future?


This proposal actually intertwines two functions: internet-drafts and RFCs.  The RFCs surely come under the RFC Editor function.  Internet-Drafts?  That’s not clear.  It is also not clear when the Program will complete its work, but I suspect we will know more within a month.  It would be good if this proposal “directed” through the results of the RFCed-future program, but that will be a matter of timing.  Certainly the IETF should not dictate to the other streams.

Eliot