IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 13 February 2021 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8443A2415 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:58:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bh8djOfPTbR9 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3044B3A1BD3 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:54:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA8BFA8; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:53:59 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JACSl3jwOs_7; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:53:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.119] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16762BFA0; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:53:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1613177637; bh=TW/sMAbmXKLFRiwDdH89eeOR3mzLXFNu6IMENySe+Qg=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=abQZQReP0psaSYzd8xzBNl1QbKvg6fCxpVGmc9sFvKTqRueFSlEAVYthQhWX2/3aR MTyVQ31jMojULreqPY8Jki7OD13eXH8F4A3dr5MqAbgsHL5zABaDhSuhg5yq6YT52e VsTev53snih1Whw6A+dGZoFXBZbEZ/pFpdhon8xk=
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
Cc: vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
References: <20210212205351.27E4B6DDB49D@ary.qy> <3b4ea13c-0743-c882-7fc0-1fe7288f6d07@gont.com.ar>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <a2e6c65e-076a-8875-c374-56c825105a6c@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:53:56 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3b4ea13c-0743-c882-7fc0-1fe7288f6d07@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JMvDLP9wU24kYy2lJsIWbZ7yFMeOzUPID"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/aTE72OTcLafhIOTapOneq47oBU0>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 00:58:35 -0000

I think Fernando is spot on here:

On 12/02/2021 21:24, Fernando Gont wrote:
> As a hint, this work: draft-kuehlewind-shmoo-remote-fee does, IMO, more 
> for many axis of inclusiveness than any specific recommnendation on 
> language.

It's always seemed to me that the main unfair advantage we
who can choose to engage with the IETF enjoy is the time and
money to spend the money and time required to meaningfully
participate. I don't know how to fix that but I do think that
draft from Mirja, Jon and Rich comes the closest I've seen to
attempting to address that usefully.

More of the same would be great.

Cheers,
S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email