IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 20 October 2021 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6163E3A0CDB for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cDzBUIkc60wl for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-f170.google.com (mail-vk1-f170.google.com [209.85.221.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72CF3A0CDD for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id u130so772612vku.2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jrXBTqG50VK61n4oSTaLs8DoYa+3UOfU6L5yI8Vg4dk=; b=ER+3Y1rvTkZdc0nJgxG4SzrMXDne5i/zxWxp/Ug25MNRmWU+UuEjPbtvnNe552s4fh XluwR8LNfTfomc6vk/YXFZ2DSsyR1f818nR5sqoUVoFtVGPVMp6BLdBnkxZ66Ch33uzN l2zhM9ry8BMBFNzYi67CijoPjPUeQKbNPuYd2nHBq1jeg9lXjzZX9AQ/xFK9nVEUJ8ua 9cJGgMXoLYhFo99JNKByBYII5uYCEZTm9cnrUdBXbRt26V04x3Q2IWqWyYUWvtbC/nlI f9Kv/l6/1kApeH2BUNwsc+poKtGdWM2iuEkIb/G75qlevnlA/e1qaqghKiuefyNz4/uh dovA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eIM3VCHCg58HJGsDjeOFHkDUEcrdFjtwYYN6yP8S2rNhoflf0 wAXabaLpCESXBgUMneZriVG1TL13O2CiNqlvmMOaWPlHoIo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwltVzZKNKmAeftFVbSfKokp8dXlOwre5FR/WlDQp5N2DKJhEXzun0xYPwvyHCzuOxgtC46iK781o6usTQSvDw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:da0:: with SMTP id bc32mr1434164vkb.4.1634755759759; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com> <CALaySJKYG8ydGrgdSKZY1b28VL2DvwTS_3_40y_eFkHcGjdJXg@mail.gmail.com> <631045B5-9249-41C1-AC0B-C4D33AE254EE@akamai.com> <CAJU8_nXp3ioPsiedL3vc=2C-ZFTcjzj=00X_CVS9G9LEHALX3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nXp3ioPsiedL3vc=2C-ZFTcjzj=00X_CVS9G9LEHALX3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:49:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+mrNG1C5SqXsKUuDvWg=6HewDrqOTaTsqN9oMksnSEqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/cW5_khDIsWZLkknPRGMPdVJ0evA>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 18:49:26 -0000

Exactly, Kyle; thanks for rephrasing more clearly.

Barry

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:34 PM Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 2:16 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> >    Third, while I appreciate the desire not to have ADs move straight to
>>     the IAB or vice-versa, and while a one-year gap before making the move
>>     is not unreasonable, the issue is more of a challenge for someone
>>     moving into the IETF Chair role.  Here are two reasons why:
>>
>> I agree it's an issue. I think the more important issue, now, is to get "new blood" into leadership positions. Others of course may disagree.
>
>
> I think part of Barry's point is that we have a supply problem: not enough good candidates. Further constraining supply at a time like that is probably unwise. If you want new blood and not end up with incompetent leadership, you have to somehow solve that issue. I might be more inclined to agree on the desirability of term limits if there were lots of deserving candidates being passed over, but that is simply not the case today.
>
> Kyle
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email