Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Sat, 11 September 2021 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1159D3A0FFD; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.091
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.091 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9JSiioL5dBm; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B8C3A0FF9; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:b879:6f74:8d4c:6a0b] ([IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:b879:6f74:8d4c:6a0b]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 18BBQQB1060106 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:26:27 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1631359587; bh=NDx8F25eDsVGu3Q9ok4wUyzFMT+dCdtLcQB5JKLgzfA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=tfb2x5TdZ/OS7spZnWKmAFRTYbg7XcfG73coov2vw6m2F37dOAxhzQG0Rg3DZUxOc MTFxPFzyFXgCHTS0lrW9OzrGcIctwjouY4boDLfImabOWFZ36MCYg2jNOL+0t5qcMW 12aGLowyufOpQsc+7kx4Cx2R++0DzDkfn08AUxQA=
To: Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <20210906191255.760B42778391@ary.qy> <6F720ED1-DFC6-4DF0-B36A-BE5379F10F5A@ietf.org> <E2BF3163-56E1-47BC-A608-F19AED04D361@mnot.net> <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org> <4D704856-F291-4E39-BBA9-2C3A1ACACBC8@mnot.net> <CAChr6SxvB6eTi5B3WfM8-uX5soc+brh81sX6D2dzQTmgJ9dMNg@mail.gmail.com> <0C75A2F6-C0C6-4F66-B29D-5C2D892D5CBC@episteme.net> <e99a9947-9c37-63af-fa51-38cdf840f4b5@lear.ch> <17FF704B-4843-4092-B73A-A2768E85C0CF@episteme.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <99ce67bb-5f5a-5645-2adb-85c8c0531914@lear.ch>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:26:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <17FF704B-4843-4092-B73A-A2768E85C0CF@episteme.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uuQs6WAVAoNMIOs7RulxNkrGX9Xjplyn0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/ekc959KLHf5lfvBn4JkMw2XAfyE>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 11:26:35 -0000

Hi Pete,

To follow up on this, I support this work being dispatched, either to an 
AD-sponsored draft or to a WG.

Eliot

On 07.09.21 20:04, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2021, at 4:55, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
>> This draft was posted eight days ago. Some of us require advice on 
>> this matter outside of this room. I'd ask that you defer any action 
>> until we can get that advice. I don't anticipate that taking long (a 
>> week or so?).
>
> I'm not sure I understand: You need time for outside advice on the 
> dispatch question? I can understand perhaps needing advice on giving 
> input to the content of the document, but I'm not clear why you would 
> need advice to give input to the dispatch question.
>
> pr