Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 07 September 2021 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48B93A1C46 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNdCZBEJuik5 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1583A1C44 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id f65so323712pfb.10 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j9uEBJsLmcQJLHI5apf8DuJ2cH9Yej+SWhhXa8HtIRw=; b=T2yjwAlJvgNfJ/4E9UPr/W5UIMJr66lHoJSyGXMvczAvtlGbYGcScpKakXjtTs3exs hHJ9I5V7HkFFs9Fxd3/PPkD1rrv7MYhe8KMJj+Ht66swlplYzWeR4LB+ZVyn0uJFX9C2 7o0Fi87xcOWbqVFFocFuj8bZclc/NcU4cZnvldErgD/kXyu9kaHWj9vMRHQfh8uB2NK8 N16RG2k8sKc6znk5QXdQEIhKngKwjBgAcZFlXZ2RLbJoQx0WZJSvxtn/yAqUbJSWgKXc r/d7dz726KTUu8yBO0CeONTf2R448nSkoxk2f/dIx0KcXW7038toKn5K6UuJejoz4G3l V90Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j9uEBJsLmcQJLHI5apf8DuJ2cH9Yej+SWhhXa8HtIRw=; b=NVfllwpK4NMO2ulErztb/ImOhT+zNxoRlBZD6qFtUD0Yc2/yHjKHOk4y50gIOL5n8n PEE/Wf1iVZoNbGL0KEcA+eS706q40GnpJz1EwRtjxIbJj8UjeWr714zvaOEp/o6m7wB5 a+KfXZrsq/+MelWCS/oqyrmf5o/T/tSsH77e26j6Vx7orgkRbKl92FMjF87ecSNM2NJF oODj696FDlWoQch5ReUc7+MoIA0dQxFXh4p4Yf7IErqNImV2TQRNbC/dLk4YMIJA47ws pMNNBwC4JC4jM+yoL2FuOOtF7guwjYYwzo4/el/GULbkS1eJ/WUw5gJaJJtmfN/s9l1n WPww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530OEgPDYBRp7mpf08QL/HqupAWf6EDq9TaLJhcTkrhbKGSg3Arw +guw0Z1T5uv1+uEmS80f3HtSpArQTps=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhckMhWvMuE5UhHYl7Kb012LbnSf79/oeYlCvUkQkZxFA5O2xOOFM9NPD4RWtfl7eInvezEQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:6283:: with SMTP id f3mr551322pgv.369.1631054111649; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 15:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q21sm148695pgk.71.2021.09.07.15.35.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 15:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <20210906191255.760B42778391@ary.qy> <6F720ED1-DFC6-4DF0-B36A-BE5379F10F5A@ietf.org> <E2BF3163-56E1-47BC-A608-F19AED04D361@mnot.net> <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org> <4D704856-F291-4E39-BBA9-2C3A1ACACBC8@mnot.net> <CAChr6SxvB6eTi5B3WfM8-uX5soc+brh81sX6D2dzQTmgJ9dMNg@mail.gmail.com> <0C75A2F6-C0C6-4F66-B29D-5C2D892D5CBC@episteme.net> <e99a9947-9c37-63af-fa51-38cdf840f4b5@lear.ch> <17FF704B-4843-4092-B73A-A2768E85C0CF@episteme.net> <6d2317d0-08f2-1515-eb01-56486e45dcaa@lear.ch>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <eb512394-e421-feac-b20d-a6280721358a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 10:35:06 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6d2317d0-08f2-1515-eb01-56486e45dcaa@lear.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/f8UMMZEjYJsTpfHHfsqVyaEWAVs>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 22:35:16 -0000

On 08-Sep-21 06:06, Eliot Lear wrote:
> They are related Pete.  The real question is whether this is advice that 
> should be given by the IETF.  As I have access to anti-trust experts, I 
> thought I would ask one.  I have done, and am awaiting his response.

On that question, I've got email back to 2006 suggesting that we need to
do this, as many other SDOs do, and I haven't seen any argument that it's
a mistake. We've just ducked the actual doing (even the education suggested
by the BOF in 2012 hasn't really happened).

Legal advice from yet another source is a fine idea, of course, but we've
asked before, and the legal answer has always been "Yes, do it."

   Brian

> 
> Eliot
> 
> On 07.09.21 20:04, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> On 7 Sep 2021, at 4:55, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>
>>> This draft was posted eight days ago. Some of us require advice on 
>>> this matter outside of this room. I'd ask that you defer any action 
>>> until we can get that advice. I don't anticipate that taking long (a 
>>> week or so?).
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand: You need time for outside advice on the 
>> dispatch question? I can understand perhaps needing advice on giving 
>> input to the content of the document, but I'm not clear why you would 
>> need advice to give input to the dispatch question.
>>
>> pr
> 
>