IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 07 September 2021 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BB93A1713; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 02:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROW2bvovnlPp; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 02:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC60E3A170A; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 02:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.143.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 1879QdGs018361; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 02:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1631006809; x=1631093209; i=@elandsys.com; bh=FJJ2y5mg6BZduzA6yI5v5kQ2KOaGlHY6ahqpPzJ+45Q=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Yw7KT3d+/EMx9OZo9sWbwnbp+cIX1o0xY2sfD74GARZyET6kDAjPEMZbA9bbQz4oU i5RG/1ZSNFPNhYmUwNTBXPpBH+vK+MtgkuBYt1of3H2UNgdEgVdY1mnCrDhAvtQP4Z iBedm0FgII1l3FFyDfLOseqzHRAU0Q9XJ9J5cq0c=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20210907022234.0b882680@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 02:25:56 -0700
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org>
References: <20210906191255.760B42778391@ary.qy> <6F720ED1-DFC6-4DF0-B36A-BE5379F10F5A@ietf.org> <E2BF3163-56E1-47BC-A608-F19AED04D361@mnot.net> <C8BF5ADB-CB36-4C8B-A14B-E9B39B016DCE@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/hIJSPdCJJ8a31_QZ7peg4DNiBXE>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:26:58 -0000

Hi Jay,
At 06:55 PM 06-09-2021, Jay Daley wrote:
>3.  S. Moonesamy points out that "dominant position" should be 
>better explained as relating to participants whose employer maybe in 
>a dominant market position.
[snip]

>Have I got it correct this time?

The short answer is Yes.  Christian explained it better.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email