IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sun, 14 February 2021 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EC23A09D7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:22:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VX8s28shgA-R for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:22:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4A73A09CF for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:1c77:acfc:e6a8:1311] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:2b9:1c77:acfc:e6a8:1311]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA31128064B; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:22:01 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
References: <202102141431.11EEVr5x077250@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <09083e69-3230-be19-7ce8-1e524fbd1520@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 17:21:49 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <202102141431.11EEVr5x077250@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/k-95Rdgy7YG3r5xm5TjMLz-4zIY>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft charter text: terminology-related WG
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:22:12 -0000

On 14/2/21 11:31, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
[...]
> 
> I would indeed like to see a broader charter than TERM as it
> is expressed today.  I am of the position that language is
> such a tiny part of the larger problem that addressing only
> the language would actually be paying disrespect to the real
> problem, and those organizations that have done just that
> and moved on are no better for having done so, and those
> that have not are no worse off for having not done so.

Bravo!


That's indeed how I feel about it.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email