IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] draft-kucherawy-bcp97bis

Kirsty Paine <kirsty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 September 2022 07:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kirsty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A6CC1524D7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 00:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPwmrwrYxie7 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 00:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2022C1524C7 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 00:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id r17so349338pgr.7 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=hp6OqH+m08uhaoEhutZhigWZOZiA9j15uHpvHWVx5Rk=; b=Rk61TQpFpHIoP21Rbqv6xNOMDiNu5I4WGVvogsSPdqewbIIqEEKtfXF7zD4yF/ioA7 QDG/0NalGnM0KpaRSF/pqFXqklGwJkuYZYa15Cm9pZBmFZK4niauOpCPGBpOTh/DvwoR 8sqw9s/sUFfoAqYwRtH8Z2xtQ/9K34G8zVHh8Zj8am/haIy8D7PbpVPwd0LpbyBae8Cc 8g3j7FJ0r6PcSGi9fZLipsa3vJotddpohBFog6kc44OrM92IF+fEBSVaWOh1+CM+GXPY ELk4VKa5fmhW1f+W1Opcg2MswJK/u7LTx3kCocGABeUu49q/W0/29cJ/2zkUk38RUux2 2OSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=hp6OqH+m08uhaoEhutZhigWZOZiA9j15uHpvHWVx5Rk=; b=poDTHcLAlbte5kF/Lsc0Z2C6x50wJtcgz/fqCV79ybeCzeJtVuMSkJe8mghOdFiNJN GLrfE9krX6G4NXjUTgYy2WpqMKusPP8OXV3IKMqTqaf1DEQq6JSvEIZCx3Net9VJp84x FatqcOhl7sUCWz1zhOIRlmgI3zC3rurSo9Mjd9wN7LJ6Z7gp7AkgslTPmw6ILcGXrJc9 S/eKtOhyDmOLAjCWt13qDyq96/6d5DRGixfCWH9RpJyA1vhQ2gSgvCbJsOtVaeXRFycr kxdb+9Xp60uG/rsMXT5jEWxF5PjsJvo4JxeHGeZnkSstRmIlUwKJZj22LWjc79FWD7Kh mY9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1yZp54ySMaqbXVL2VuHwX9VqlzKGsOj+Rlo2cQXyZ+MnpuAQid D5Q30xaw5cVWfaKVhmE4y3RDo3kd/M89aAbAnQUqcT80
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7Pm2vRbeu/9YALmHOFEuABn5MVdL++NTNYh+gXdUgRrQ/lqtuCuiNMckpLVJs5S/gMflnKsqIwiUWjCMPy880=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:88f:b0:52c:6962:274f with SMTP id q15-20020a056a00088f00b0052c6962274fmr2494955pfj.12.1662535652088; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbpuvCLF68jdW-3ZDa4eACSSrVEyPDpyR9=GBoWFtT+1w@mail.gmail.com> <11f201d8ab0b$53fd5190$fbf7f4b0$@olddog.co.uk> <1501eb83-0260-4681-d1c9-6e2173b8f833@gmail.com> <CAChr6SxQK4rRhp-K-CEbZge=ow5mPpFa+wokJXkDtKuoTt9njQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC9wnY-hfqOXYr4Nke9OVf8Eyc3OVw_y2yyRpBWFgPmBQA4aLQ@mail.gmail.com> <940a5cc7-0ac7-8f73-39db-43d012b7bef5@network-heretics.com> <7b89642d-02b1-329f-52ab-c41d421b9bfd@network-heretics.com> <CAL0qLwanzqVkYZidM8T6L-rwEGChCZ+zeHZww5=sCyQL3_u=4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwanzqVkYZidM8T6L-rwEGChCZ+zeHZww5=sCyQL3_u=4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kirsty Paine <kirsty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 09:26:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC9wnY-XSp5T-Xg=HE7G3bsgJ-=eMiU5rytKSVTiWp7B=+OZVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f820da05e8113e1a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/kf0_HEI8FBlz-bXqL0Jbqg8RCuM>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] draft-kucherawy-bcp97bis
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 07:27:59 -0000

Hi gendispatch,

Thanks for your input and views. Enough time has passed that we can
consider this to have had a good community airing. I see weak support for
AD sponsorship and no objection to that route, so Murray - please do
continue and thanks for progressing this work.

Kirsty

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 6:41 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I did start this discussion there, and the original thread can be found
> there.  One participant was adamant that this should be sent through a
> DISPATCH group to confirm that AD-sponsorship was appropriate.  If that's
> the outcome, then that's on the record rather than being an ad hoc choice,
> and we can proceed.
>
> Alongside that, any further feedback on what the document currently says
> is welcome.
>
> -MSK
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 12:34 PM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Postscript: this is actually something that would have once been
>> reasonable to discuss on the ietf@ list.   IMO it should still be
>> reasonable to hold such discussions there.
>>
>> Keith
>>
>> On 8/15/22 15:30, Keith Moore wrote:
>> > I think this work needs to be done somehow, even if it's mostly going
>> > to be a chore rather than something that people get excited about.   I
>> > don't have a problem with AD sponsorship of this draft, and spinning
>> > up a separate WG seems unnecessarily cumbersome.
>> >
>> > Keith
>> >
>> > On 8/15/22 04:25, Kirsty Paine wrote:
>> >> Hi gendispatchers,
>> >>
>> >> I'm seeing weak support for continued AD-sponsorship of this draft.
>> >> Please raise any strong objections or endorsements for that summary
>> >> and path forward, ideally in the next fortnight.
>> >>
>> >> On dispatching process: if a topic generates lots of discussion,
>> >> seems controversial or raises strong multi-party disagreements on
>> >> paths forward, then we need agenda time to discuss more thoroughly.
>> >> However, if it doesn't (and so far, it seems it does not), I'm happy
>> >> to pass this through via mailing list consensus when stretched over a
>> >> long period (multiple weeks), as it provides ample opportunity for
>> >> the community to object or endorse.
>> >>
>> >> Therefore, please share your views in the next fortnight...
>> >>
>> >> Kirsty
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> Gendispatch mailing list
>> Gendispatch@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch
>>
> --
> Gendispatch mailing list
> Gendispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email