[Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates question be within the charter for procon?
"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 15 July 2025 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5EB4452BB9 for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_Ct_gY0D1Uv for <gendispatch@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.st.icloud.com (p-east2-cluster2-host2-snip4-2.eps.apple.com [57.103.78.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27E44452BB0 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.st.icloud.com (unknown [127.0.0.2]) by outbound.st.icloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505891801BDC; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:11:00 +0000 (UTC)
Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kuehlewind.net; s=sig1; bh=3cJ7kyTs18CymcGY/Ll7U1YxWPGI1ulY+jGa94NIkkY=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To:x-icloud-hme; b=c9HMQn9COM6DpjP/QmWEgKi0CqKWGk/CfZ2Wyqd/lWpuAj3//Ige8h11Y9p+YDLTbrcNjpWUOiVFGnTQxwEVvH29VQu5tfzH2U2EKUUFZUrWEkiWIh29sodUIPJ3aDraCVimQZGOjx2ktS1K3sRyGEwdc41hh1cRntr0TDrl2/Jh3gkJQG6Ldg1jgX1oh9dGRdsPp0OfISMEDhO7JsoVeaVKxMs6pr2PHkJCqqL8mApWFyyOJelpVydYq54bw7xRUZ5c5+sC8j5un7VqO+buUH2FantM4pZ+fyQFdyMClRcwqteVu8siMxT+pbmXdBBlAQ17k6bxeFafdPkP8Njvew==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (st-asmtp-me-k8s.p00.prod.me.com [17.42.251.67]) by outbound.st.icloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7099D1800D53; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 13:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <23797.1750953043@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:08:57 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <88C7EF29-C583-4DC0-97DD-A77599364202@kuehlewind.net>
References: <2027567.1749411385@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <49aa3e0a-71de-4f3d-a9c9-0fe7c0342c24@gmail.com> <BN2P110MB11070B3A4F8A4EEAA4549E97DC7AA@BN2P110MB1107.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <23797.1750953043@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1)
X-Proofpoint-GUID: coJuuwfkQ7rwzHo228NENepnVeYluimd
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUwNzE1MDEyMSBTYWx0ZWRfX+Km9Z+kdzeje W5NutiNw+Uh0Bu9aEVcv4pHgi+xU54R67jZBl5Sih8KW4225LNH8iUalsabxdv8OvZ6SpKn8nK5 ALamWOCaKJhEUnF9c4ZRUoDOMgOTEoedVBk6vn6xUOEiLws5ONLZx1oI4wQ8nYGXUj9M8ZnchkJ oqIqsxuV8iJ2NCm/huPWfKtf2TxgSfognD9sxAQ416WPeX4XdP3UK//2fq/h1ZOYtx6LAj3Aejb CXUluSiLVysfmCHOhstFH6J+hafzf8nj7B4d+jGHtH0QoWPvIM4ITCEXtT7kW40oh/AamiGjs=
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: coJuuwfkQ7rwzHo228NENepnVeYluimd
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-07-15_03,2025-07-15_01,2025-03-28_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1030 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2506270000 definitions=main-2507150121
Message-ID-Hash: RZY2QZOJS6H3ZYZQ5IZIE2LE56NW2G7W
X-Message-ID-Hash: RZY2QZOJS6H3ZYZQ5IZIE2LE56NW2G7W
X-MailFrom: ietf@kuehlewind.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, "procon@ietf.org" <procon@ietf.org>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates question be within the charter for procon?
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/lJo0zOW82t7-J8NIzMEWtLvitCE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:gendispatch-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gendispatch-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all, I thought the updates tag draft should go into RSWG, that also why we resubmitted at some point with -rswg- in the name. However, that group seems to be too much focused on other things :-( Mirja > On 26. Jun 2025, at 17:50, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> wrote: >> [Roman] Procedurally, I am trying to find the right balance between >> accomplishing the original goal of PROCON to simply producing a 2026bis >> and 2048bis which consolidates all updates into a single draft while >> simultaneously opening up these documents for procedural revisions. I >> am open to recharters at a measured pace. My current opinion is that >> having stable 2026bis/2048bis I-Ds or even RFCs will position us best >> to them make subsequent changes. ==[ snip ]== > > This works for me. > While I agree that it does not fit into the current procon charter, I think > it's the same group of people in the end. > So let's get to stable 2026bis first. > > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > procon mailing list -- procon@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to procon-leave@ietf.org
- [Gendispatch] could the Updates question be withi… Michael Richardson
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates ques… Brian E Carpenter
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] Re: could the Updates … Roman Danyliw
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] Re: could the Updates … Michael Richardson
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates ques… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates ques… Michael Richardson
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates ques… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates ques… Michael Richardson
- [Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates ques… Pete Resnick