Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification - draft-eggert-bcp45bis-04.txt

Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org> Thu, 09 September 2021 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <exec-director@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442B33A1F0B; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 00:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QaAYXQnxaEz4; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 00:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfx.ietf.org (ietfx.ietf.org [4.31.198.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D93FC3A1F03; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 00:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C447B4A8D5B5; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 00:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from ietfx.ietf.org ([4.31.198.45]) by localhost (ietfx.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id db7jUY6RCtzh; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 00:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) by ietfx.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2EA6490033D; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 00:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <40144D1F-3D7F-4C43-9C4E-2F914B5458D1@eggert.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 19:06:21 +1200
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>, draft-eggert-bcp45bis.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D966AC43-0597-4316-A928-FD82F98A1F3B@ietf.org>
References: <163101639697.11702.11425677914483803771@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJK7gF_FZRoYc_mhk62jGEvsO8oD-_rSpBErwNRvjHmpEg@mail.gmail.com> <40144D1F-3D7F-4C43-9C4E-2F914B5458D1@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/mQx208VQt_0qC1yMN_NgquRVpZM>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification - draft-eggert-bcp45bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 07:06:35 -0000


> On 9/09/2021, at 6:50 PM, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for the suggestions. Please see https://github.com/larseggert/bcp45bis/pull/6 for a PR that rolls those in.
> 
> On 2021-9-8, at 23:41, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>>  Because an SAA serves at the discretion of the IETF Chair - even if
>>  the IETF Chair is not otherwise involved in the operation of the SAA
>>  team - any SAA decision could be appealed to the IAB.  The IAB shall
>>  then review the situation and attempt to resolve it in a manner of
>>  its own choosing.
>> 
>> Why are we varying from the normal appeal process here?  One reason to
>> keep the IETF Chair out of the operation is exactly so the first
>> appeal *can* go to the IETF Chair, as it normally would.  Then to the
>> plenary IESG, and then to the IAB.  I don't see a good reason to
>> change that process.
> 
> This was also brought up by Rob during his AD review. This text is based on the current text in BCP45, which says:
> 
>   The IETF Chair, the IETF Executive Director, or a sergeant-at-arms
>   appointed by the Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person,
>   or of a thread, when the content is inappropriate and represents a
>   pattern of abuse.  They are encouraged to take into account the
>   overall nature of the postings by an individual and whether
>   particular postings are an aberration or typical.  Complaints
>                                                      ^^^^^^^^^^
>   regarding their decisions should be referred to the IAB.
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> I assumed that "complaints" were supposed to be appeals, because otherwise it's undefined what the IAB was supposed to do with these complaints.
> 
> I'm fully OK with using the regular appeals process here, but since it would be a change from the original BCP45 and the intent was to do a minimal bis, I didn't make that change.

As an aside - In case anyone has forgotten, the IETF Executive Director (me) can no longer do this as per RFC 8717.

Jay 

> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
> 
> -- 
> Gendispatch mailing list
> Gendispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org