Re: [Gendispatch] A gendispatch session at IETF 118?

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 04 September 2023 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9146AC14CE4D; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DBP95L-0PwnL; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E89C14CE22; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rf9ps21Kvz6GwyK; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1693790533; bh=Gkk7GUCR8lMRZ436WNCBLHGtdddm5ld5MmQaMC92pXQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=pcpCLkRzsAD9Gch4lCFgrZIo4nS1GzPtRQMJXR2hk4yL1Qd4yBltOmgtJ6jFPadHB CCTVP/MFmj/djlV1BuNMa6RGJDL/wzEp8Vw8U8w7BqRPNXRNecggf5Qsoi57W7H57j j7N7Q1jaFo6J/h5CP+RBoZWdYWGR5lqpAsVM+SgY=
X-Quarantine-ID: <2ccrZaw3csEl>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.20.19] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rf9pq6jphz6Gwy1; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 18:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ed7b3d50-25d2-d82d-3514-3d5282f18c56@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 21:22:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Cc: GENDISPATCH Chairs <gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
References: <6036cbfa3f204dcebdd2a2393a6101ab@huawei.com> <9b9a6c68-877b-42c5-9231-e95f0df4e190@betaapp.fastmail.com> <4cb7e10e-673d-27cf-1115-d721c5aa1a1e@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <4cb7e10e-673d-27cf-1115-d721c5aa1a1e@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/r-Ff5a16Wkbra1GTgLeGjfckF-w>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] A gendispatch session at IETF 118?
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 01:22:17 -0000

I think forcing tombstones would be a very good idea.  Deciding when to 
do so may be more than a little interesting.

Yours,

Joel

On 9/3/2023 9:06 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 04/09/2023 01:23, Martin Thomson wrote:
>
>> Paul and I just submitted
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-gendispatch-no-expiry-01 
>>
>>
>>  We've talked about this in the past.  This version contains a
>> suggested response to the criticism that the last version received.
>
> The draft seems fine to me. I'd suggest adding a
> recommendation that it'd be useful to publish a
> tombstone version for drafts that are no longer
> under consideration (at that point in time) as I
> do think we have a small problem with drafts that
> are going nowhere, but that not being visible to
> readers. Not a big deal, but could be worthwhile,
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>