IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 07 December 2021 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEE93A16D6; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:50:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bztWLpOzfdpU; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46B1F3A0ACC; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:3164:1d35:c658:6f62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27297601B37; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 17:50:33 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1638892233; bh=utHVmtoYRbTNbL6VqrD1LbY6w4ti0pkD5M1zAGMOZdM=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=WMhkn5kW5DyPAvGN7VrK7S6uiqF0qjo6Wfg9hMJFbAd28eLACDVdcRStWT4ekpYW1 HwctP1mKdo+oWGhNBtxtpBNPpi137IkJZbHpOIx1GLX8SU9yYhyWtWKmDDoP5vRtdO E/m0GyHgnbYiCM0m0o7fu+qRp5FmArmad5NAqOfQ=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7F6A44C3-6987-40C9-B8DC-C805EA04EFE9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <613813a1-56f4-dfe0-4190-030f7fc62bbd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 17:50:32 +0200
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, gendispatch@ietf.org
Message-Id: <A132D1D2-D641-4A41-BAA0-F74ACF6B3CA3@eggert.org>
References: <163855769969.31433.9138331865709979880@ietfa.amsl.com> <613813a1-56f4-dfe0-4190-030f7fc62bbd@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 27297601B37.AF626
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/skOZtuTlT6qGH0qQbu1PYYyLhI8>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] WG Review: General Area Dispatch (gendispatch)
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 15:50:44 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-12-3, at 21:45, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Work related to the IAB, IETF LLC, IRTF,
>> and RFC Editor processes is out of scope.
> 
> Hang on... does that mean that any proposal to update BCP101 is out of scope?
> That can't be right. I assume this is intended to make IETF LLC internal
> procedures out of scope, but in that case the statement is too general.

that text already exists in the current charter, FWIW, and wasn't changed.

I think this is not only about LLC internal procedures, but also many other topics which are under the control of the named bodies. Do you have a suggestion for how to rephrase that?

(As for updates to BCP101, I could see "bugfix" revisions be done via gendispatch, but anything major would likelt require a new WG.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email