[Gendispatch] Re: [procon] could the Updates question be within the charter for procon?

["Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <[e-mail]>]

The draft provides a definition of the tags which are meta data of an RFC which I think should be uniformly defined for the whole series. If each stream uses these tags then, is a question for each stream separately.

> On 15. Jul 2025, at 18:10, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> I thought the updates tag draft should go into RSWG, that also why we
>> resubmitted at some point with -rswg- in the name. However, that group
>> seems to be too much focused on other things :-(
> 
> hi, I can see some mechanical questions that the RSWG should ask the RPC to
> figure out.    Particularly around Amends that effectively are complicated errata.
> It might be the RPC might want to subdivide some of Amends/Extends/See-Also
> into more categories.
> 
> But, I think that the semantics of when/how/why to use these needs to remain
> with the stream itself.
> 
>>> On 26. Jun 2025, at 17:50, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> [Roman] Procedurally, I am trying to find the right balance between
>>>> accomplishing the original goal of PROCON to simply producing a 2026bis
>>>> and 2048bis which consolidates all updates into a single draft while
>>>> simultaneously opening up these documents for procedural revisions.  I
>>>> am open to recharters at a measured pace.  My current opinion is that
>>>> having stable 2026bis/2048bis I-Ds or even RFCs will position us best
>>>> to them make subsequent changes.  ==[ snip ]==
>>> 
>>> This works for me.
>>> While I agree that it does not fit into the current procon charter, I think
>>> it's the same group of people in the end.
>>> So let's get to stable 2026bis first.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>>> Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> procon mailing list -- [e-mail]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gendispatch mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]