IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Mon, 10 July 2023 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447DC15154E for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00aX7y91B9Nt for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC9CAC151075 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51cff235226so9847421a12.0 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689021509; x=1691613509; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LoQ76xXCY7Dp98/7w+X3nSZAMJcXi6UpffW53xjJSS0=; b=i9G+y0zD1fhwHCSpi7j0j1BDGsKL2mHevP9T2gd81168rQOrAO1cLPBtSmzou/DMpp aR3eP3kR4o2V6MpfPdIorhryGi0kniI2//wrhFEA/dCFEV4eNbHOdY5qGDxw2Hqv5DS7 beBkKn1Sm56JxeLfXPidOtzG+q2VdJ8bT8lbZ2lIL0SsUlP8XljEAAxOQN6Upsk5NL4S 3tS721KAKieGuxk+3xTIAN44J+phRNBcrcjmpR5hf/GxP7E9kCpEgnbUtSbBl7v4v6Pw IY8C54n0k6/Hq8ljovMl/VEU9gIXpjEMdx2hpe/IKWygbOkUjCA5AfaBcKXGlB/td3f4 R6dQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689021509; x=1691613509; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LoQ76xXCY7Dp98/7w+X3nSZAMJcXi6UpffW53xjJSS0=; b=i3nuNyXKqoyz3xuAnn0347SaBxuT/XqH//tZ43dAGBhlN9xJ748aTQV+0OBVneSQ7g +1ayS8ZTT9iuV6co/EebCNSOy4b4mffuI7JQeXfa5TAIUQaLKfb5YBePbhdLBrTNxf08 pmFQbkQs0OKEZjG9BRIh3Z9AWJ2utdjQCSaBRKAT5I35B3M37xwv4ZplrJcIzEX5+Wzu bRcDLSYg45VDVFAA7XyYZBbSwh3d3yWlE8egjIgqr0OEMaVqyO4jYI6Q4iQCJlLKHxhn 2sRbZCLudqs6RSpwYuy4Dde0pP0eSZn6PE0rz5Ssat2D63ptwBoBtJBK0RC7zgNZa6Rw IycQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbxeTscOwNnCRiBR6Rth5iK3SwSxQXWYUWqJ56wR3Wx0WvUbuov Oq21sbTTpezehd2Ptr0Jp5lmT/fDPNRwUUk3/2e7/VcK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGneSD+k9Z/8KMSYIaPu8MC8Fh0AeHxZTtT8ejdy5vn2JDOy8E/fGqLpRfn9yNKJR50EAbUBNYhKceKM0C08Lo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:280d:b0:51e:2c4b:6f1e with SMTP id h13-20020a056402280d00b0051e2c4b6f1emr19806823ede.14.1689021508866; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sy438qwyf+WD-K6Ciow1HYwhbCofM0p-2cTK1C2+TG9VQ@mail.gmail.com> <AM7PR03MB6451BFA05DC02EDC028805C5EE30A@AM7PR03MB6451.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAChr6SzoZovqxyJPBTTaVoMsggrJLsud8VtJ+i1bMn_wF7cLFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SzoZovqxyJPBTTaVoMsggrJLsud8VtJ+i1bMn_wF7cLFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwHKGJzX7iM2-YPQZqUW8pbEJBDz+oK6Es1q1GroS7L2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Cc: Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann@dcms.gov.uk>, Marek Blachut <marek.blachut@dcms.gov.uk>, GENDISPATCH List <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000dd868060027f7a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/ul2HSkFnsstR9aVlwuUMMaJDuZs>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:38:34 -0000

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:11 AM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I agree with all of that, and I think that was my point. When we say
> "policy", we are talking about "governments and laws". The problem with
> this draft is that it assumes which governments will be listened to. I
> could pick some incredibly controversial examples here, but I will not.
>

Since there seems to be some confusion here, I think the term to focus on
here is "policymaker". It is in the dictionary, and used several times in
the draft.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/policymaker

That role is fine by me, it needs to be done. But here we are discussing
special arrangements for those folks, and I don't think that is a good idea.

thanks,
Rob

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status