IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-01.txt

Tony Rutkowski <rutkowski.tony@gmail.com> Thu, 09 December 2021 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rutkowski.tony@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81A33A0E95 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_DOTEDU=1.999] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yXhN9I9vTG8g for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6F23A0E98 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id b11so5564276qvm.7 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:32:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :references:from:in-reply-to; bh=+47k4kr8/PB3VAay2wHSbwNvaSsT9U7iYlEggxG88S4=; b=JgViQHMy43K8qEBTS3ENZzgi7dK8DsKXwzH/GDTi6xZ219mLM1FH3rWbeVBBu1cHCx kcki7jcTsgnRzodLrksinQcB80i1wzi9+1KEVHj8z3vhAF6tjTzu9QnBX/D9NeQdGi5u gL60sk1lRSWnfdkfroaKrPv3actzyT3jhK6fihJ/ZSZyuP8VutB/vZUzP9n/g9MbakvN +WHsghxdapbE75jbF1vJtk7wzNfAAEfFwyTMp/T04p29vcCQkRRfE1k4q/xxXmHP1AjN hRvhKPJ0CnXamhP1F4lFnOXaYLhyq2aQCKBr7NBgvOK+OWjwT1sqwjlJfsuaGC6Fl4Uu 3gzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to; bh=+47k4kr8/PB3VAay2wHSbwNvaSsT9U7iYlEggxG88S4=; b=whmaZX8ur3FR5AwI7BZlZDSkA3yKgXdBUOaUbuQ6WVHckC8Zcw4qROQ6wiInLB6fKS uW2gmFozNoN/upsg+HHVce/56Bq++EFsIBTAHD99rA1oMnfijIeF4ia2gvNPbrxkR8y2 0zTsnN4m0lKEpqR5C/NM0YkPwruxc7KiUfdrtJs1cV60EnmIzdnuakwEN/BpP39cRPpL AisTPu6cg5BhUcvuU3xsBqkJtDKYk4H9eQz8vSd/2LZhkT20125/vbc9RHfaSILm+g0/ 7/cyCxThl7ABVZn5N+TxpQik+eaRDa0BMcTV5VX7ZzP8369sq3KKGfjJh7MkHquTJbQG 9fqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53388fL4d6yXiZ9rnvYC5MeV5cPUZzrNBXFQ8XrWfXh1soOWTyuc 6p8heDGmR7oFHzy0Hvb7wv0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEvgqtBXWyanVCq+xK9WwYZD8KchlDitLo/9LUVrvYEUzvhNc1V6qqt5r5vS4TxvMTUAD9tQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2a84:: with SMTP id jr4mr18229079qvb.35.1639067561436; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.249] (pool-70-106-224-166.clppva.fios.verizon.net. [70.106.224.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o20sm94294qkp.114.2021.12.09.08.32.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Dec 2021 08:32:40 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------gbx8vWFiJGleXTKW3InaVg5r"
Message-ID: <e9ed5f2a-a3f8-7eaf-3a12-006f011496b8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 11:32:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, gendispatch@ietf.org
References: <163595251682.11706.5053299985084837548@ietfa.amsl.com> <8854c3cc-694b-1a7f-ebc8-47bed9bb4e0f@joelhalpern.com> <E1D78C01-243A-49A5-83F7-C4D7198536CF@biddle.law> <FF87658D-B09A-45C8-8484-85D71DCF2D95@mnot.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20211208144553.0b318fd8@elandnews.com>
From: Tony Rutkowski <rutkowski.tony@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20211208144553.0b318fd8@elandnews.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/uoNlZpNr7VYz3SfJB3Y-eFQ1EAk>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] I-D Action: draft-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 16:32:48 -0000

See Understanding "Balance" Requirements for Standards-Development 
Organizations (utah.edu) 
<https://dc.law.utah.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1168&context=scholarship>


On 08-Dec-21 5:52 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> At 03:19 PM 22-11-2021, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Thanks, Brad. I think this is the right framing, FWIW.
>>
>> Related but tangental question: Does the IETF have any particular 
>> reason for not opting into protection under the Standards Developing 
>> Organization Act of 2004 in the US? Last time I looked at the Federal 
>> Register, we were nowhere to be seen...
>
> Was there a response to the above question?
>
> It doesn't look like the Standards Developing Organization Act of 2004 
> is applicable to the IETF.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email