Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Thu, 27 February 2020 18:04 UTC
Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78CF3A0EC8; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:04:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5n0bojBIE4m4; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D83BF3A0E95; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0B6A17A68B; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:03:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STRSzpSdRwnR; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:03:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AEAFA17A682; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:03:57 -0600 (CST)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@ericsson.com>
Cc: gendispatch-chairs@ietf.org, gendispatch@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:03:56 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <B40B06D6-A207-474F-8BF5-B6C35ECE2DEE@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <FB17157C-375A-4F9F-B902-9E0C907932E9@ericsson.com>
References: <ED3EB3D9-480E-4D58-8767-0B1B4202F6C0@episteme.net> <FB17157C-375A-4F9F-B902-9E0C907932E9@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/wj4r7GfOLRwRlR8mkyeb_ED6B-g>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch?
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:04:07 -0000
Seems perfectly reasonable. How much time would you want on the agenda? pr On 27 Feb 2020, at 6:23, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > Hi Francesca and Pete, > > Suresh and I are working on a draft to propose a set of tags in RFC as > a replacement for the "updates" tag: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuehlewind-update-tag-01 > > The question of how to indicate relationships in the metadata for > documents comes up over and over again and many people indicated in > the last discussion that maybe redefining or replacing the "updates" > tag could be a good option (see: “Subject: Proposed IESG Statement > on the use of the “Updates” header” [0]). > > We have introduced this draft already to the stream managers of the > IAB, the IRTF and the Independent streams and Suresh just posted a > note on the rfc-i list to get more community input. I would like > request a presentation slot in gendispatch to crate awareness and > collect more feedback but I suggest to have any on-list discuss on > the rfc-I list. > > Mirja > > > [0] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-1u_1-peHKAmUDuLyGAJYu0fPCE/ > > On 16.01.20, 05:35, "ietf on behalf of Pete Resnick" > <ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of resnick@episteme.net> wrote: > > Greetings, > > As the time quickly approaches for requesting a meeting for the > March > IETF, your gendispatch chairs wonder if there are agenda items for > which > we should schedule a meeting. Please let us know on the > gendispatch list > (the Reply-To on this message is set there) within the next two > weeks if > you have any potential agenda items so we can decide if a meeting > is > necessary. > > Thanks, > > Pete & Francesca -- Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ All connections to the world are tenuous at best
- [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Adam Roach
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Pete Resnick
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Adam Roach
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] Agenda items for gendispatch? Pete Resnick