Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 13 June 2023 23:04 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA06C15153C for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FcCzZ2mj_Pk5 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97657C151541 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Qgkdm2HNPz6GvlZ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1686697468; bh=UT5++uFD1kjYX18zEbm6G86WuiYghsAW3QqBWFW09C4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=TRPZ+PFWIhym8zC49AyjfqTf4Td2Muce6kkfirBZDao8wJT8C2J1uY3uio+vvGl6G tVlz72qzOkVQ/XuTNO5pXYxtGGWGxDqIBT85YZzop/wymLz0QbUQzuWD1jRMxVMtbu YTpkeZ1bXyzbUEAaKq/R0EIgLVU5n2i4kow9bdqU=
X-Quarantine-ID: <OSqa6CcWJ6PE>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.22.80] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Qgkdj0bT8z6G7Zk; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c3cb95b2-5fae-3483-2f90-3d84664548e7@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:04:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Stacie Hoffmann <stacie.hoffmann=40dcms.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org
Cc: Marek Blachut <marek.blachut@dcms.gov.uk>
References: <168664933013.34090.4997665230118680759@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFWDOZAtWL2q9Ev8=iwuzeZici9ujGiheW2tdYg_OMoC2Pk57w@mail.gmail.com> <e5361cb7-c898-9664-872d-74a21a782d0c@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <e5361cb7-c898-9664-872d-74a21a782d0c@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/x_lRL0G9d2Mntgs0wuGGz6Ngmu0>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 23:04:33 -0000
Looking at the draft, I was struck that it goes to some trouble to make clear that if policy folks are to participate effectively, they need to also understand the technology. The point I take away from that is that the obligation is on both sides, both the policy-oriented participant and the community, to help make that education happen. Having said taht, I have trouble figuring out what to do with the draft. Not clear how or where it can usefully progress, for all that I found it interesting and informative in pulling together disparate aspects. Yours, Joel On 6/13/2023 6:46 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > I just read the draft and recalling the discussion at > IETF-116 I fear that a message that I heard being sent from > the mic line perhaps hasn't landed. > > In particular, I think a number of people said that the best > way to ensure your favourite policy topics are considered in > IETF work is to have someone who is playing a full and > constructive part in that IETF work be familiar with your > favourite policy issues. Liaising, co-ordinating and setting > up new bodies will be nowhere near as effective. > > Yes, that's expensive (in time), but so is being involved in > IETF work, so that seems fair to me fwiw. > > Cheers, > S. > > On 13/06/2023 16:31, Stacie Hoffmann wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Many thanks to those of you who provided feedback to us on the Policy >> Experts are IETF Stakeholders draft at the 116 Gen Dispatch meeting. >> >> We have uploaded a new version (see below), which we are preparing >> for the >> 117 meeting and welcome further input or ideas on how to refine our >> problem >> statement or scope potential solutions. In particular, we would welcome >> specific examples of how and where policy input is working well, and >> thoughts on a ‘landing space’ or next steps for this work. >> >> Please reach out to the authors directly with comments or suggestions. >> >> Also, if anyone is interested in reviewing or contributing to this >> document >> please let us know. It would be great to work with others on this. >> >> Best, >> >> Stacie >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:42 >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt >> To: Marek Blachut <marek.blachut@dcms.gov.uk>, Stacie Hoffmann < >> stacie.hoffmann@dcms.gov.uk> >> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, >> draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Marek Blachut and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders >> Revision: 01 >> Title: Policy experts are IETF stakeholders >> Document date: 2023-06-13 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 11 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.txt >> >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders/ >> >> Html: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01.html >> >> Htmlized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders >> >> Diff: >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-hoffmann-gendispatch-policy-stakeholders-01 >> >> >> Abstract: >> The IETF’s work has significance for wider societal, economic, and >> political communities, though gaps and barriers to engagement with >> the IETF exist for policy experts. This informational draft >> introduces a problem statement and gap analysis of existing >> initiatives related to policy expert engagement in the IETF. It >> also >> poses questions we hope to work through with others in the IETF >> community regarding how to better enable policy expert engagement in >> IETF standardisation, and on how we can build a culture which better >> supports technical and policy experts working together to develop >> more robust standards. >> >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> >> >> >> >
- [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts are I… Stacie Hoffmann
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stacie Hoffmann
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… John R Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Christian Huitema
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Colin Perkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Eric Rescorla
- [Gendispatch] savage beasts at IETF meetings Jim Reid
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stacie Hoffmann
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Rob Sayre
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Andrew Alston
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Andrew Alston
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Andrew Alston
- [Gendispatch] Diversity and the IETF Andrew Campling
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Rob Sayre
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Rob Sayre
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and the IETF Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Gendispatch] Updated draft: Policy experts a… Stacie Hoffmann