[Geopriv] Benoit Claise's No Objection on charter-ietf-geojson-00-02: (with COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC471A8AF0; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sk5hVkdoHd4X; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF871A87CE; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150930074129.11798.56396.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:41:29 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/5zboN0ohmCzc0NVRDNlEqtmas4g>
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, dispatch@ietf.org, dret@berkeley.edu
Subject: [Geopriv] Benoit Claise's No Objection on charter-ietf-geojson-00-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:41:31 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-geojson-00-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Very consistent feedback with my previous review:

One readability improvement.
So many RFC numbers I have to lookup, in this charter: 5870, 7464, 3693,
6280. Sorry I don't know them all by heart.
A good convention is name + RFC, such as "JavaScript Object Notation
(JSON) [RFC7159]"

I guess it's a short-lived WG, right? Two deliverables and then closed,
Would be worth mentioning IMO. In the milestones, that would be fine.