Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 23 April 2015 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD981A87DE for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMYyRkhP5Ksz for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443F61A8856 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhda23 with SMTP id a23so4743355yhd.2 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/zrtQHm4OlTFD/gbI7+3SUP/7VOrfuYrLLI++qIt7Sk=; b=njfYz4czeGNf4yrMxoKtIV+CHDTeWswlRL+WbFvwy4Pvb3Nk1cvdonz3zurl+tJb9x JkMA3PhntIc7JmIoLFz2W4E2tAc58+WVwwRGCUMv3zvCxvPYujxoR0HGFdz/X6xTH954 +WUDlWYB6XUKHYadTf8nUwPR56A4MX+BSk2koAkoep8ATpAfYf4o8dvydhItwmGgXs2y 3IMb4FST3nfZOkC5vINE58EsMBy8LtmqJtftmutwiHWCsypZKjWBFMDvriZcqVmEfTF0 gwzh843jpC+MAef/nVtJMpyqIeOnHcXe+YJ3K5leDfWXRiYp8WGZhD7Pqd8XYAJbHPdI ioCg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.106.74 with SMTP id l50mr5196699yhg.143.1429828368655; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.247.71 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D336F45@fcc.gov>
References: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D336F45@fcc.gov>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:32:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWcLErqa4b6CGUKgLVuc6HDQFdiR9nFZnzFDX20G=C3YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/7UGjuTPBwWzgx6xYItQInPf1_1Y>
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:33:08 -0000

On 23 April 2015 at 14:36, Henning Schulzrinne
<Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>; wrote:
> Can we use a model similar to RFC 7105 for updating user-configured (civic) location data in VoIP scenarios?


'twould require definition of a new measurement type that used the
civic address schema.

The success response would likely turn into an echo of the address;
failure would not include the information.  There wouldn't be any way
to annotate that with extra information about what went wrong in the
same way that recent additions to LoST might.