[Geopriv] WG status update

Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> Mon, 13 October 2014 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BEE1A891B for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ffbb6S-7gJjX for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nominet.org.uk (mx2.nominet.org.uk [213.248.242.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FF81A8912 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main2.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:X-IPAS-Result:Received:Received:From:To: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Yg9EMLD02dGWkGReGo0U+DHs12mAAcXgZxfsaGGZ6AvOfNibhQwwkNHQ CvYw0K6n6YNU3+4+FbdgSCtZS7M4z5v7TF1gO4kaCXnUPv9ldO0+vcXLK ca7cgXkbeSEGmWjmnhs5z1LM0ORLcgM18SzVLywwltqJ7X16Nb2hbeCpz XNbPDEdGS6hbmi7SNM1vPc0JuTuj+g6iVLMWdQcFEgzWc9aeWJeV4ewg0 Dq6dPPAzvGFOC9EAbyqkOFKEjG4kx;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main2.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1413193457; x=1444729457; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=DRbejEj+eEcItGkgYLzU3Zy5xEk2HrGwNNE9J5XueMU=; b=J+yHRAEK1Py526pGVrlcqc+EOWcdKfquPuzafDX6sRSFLvWCv35cvX0K Z+8pxWEFYE206yszCOqpdjVdhMhi7lJHgj+iLfyTOoVCCXQpbmGHaLo5s g2pCrAOGEOfhKsp48H8EFTReTonRp5W6uceceh1HHeeKFESG2K363x6cq da0st2MoyuSpYEXlpoVlsLQm6bG5WbRnr0qnCh1xJnDl5RfaTz562EXnF 6x8whgARk4jahAjVS5K6w21qvOAHt;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,709,1406588400"; d="scan'208";a="13095637"
X-IPAS-Result: Ah0FAGKeO1TV+MWR/2dsb2JhbABbgmsjAYETG7tdjzSIeRYBAXyECToZGx0BPkInBIhSA58/pDUBAQEek3mBHgWeeY1NhxaDd4I0gQIBAQE
Received: from wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.145]) by mx2.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2014 10:44:15 +0100
Received: from WDS-EXC1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f]) by wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:44:14 +0100
From: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
To: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG status update
Thread-Index: AQHP5so/QR+EeEhB9UyKMerYoCy9KQ==
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:44:13 +0000
Message-ID: <EDBB62E9-6974-43A3-A682-D8F47C58531E@nominet.org.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.2.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C5A42F6170D2F9438E8B5BF3E00C2115@okna.nominet.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/MkQ6sIAkNanynLoRvNAuvsfrjI8
Subject: [Geopriv] WG status update
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:44:19 -0000

Just a quick update:

draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty has now completed IETF LC and is now in IESG evaluation, on the agenda for this Thursday's IESG telechat.

Just in case anything significant comes up during IESG review my expectation is that we shall keep the WG active until this doc leaves the IESG bound for the RFC Editors.  At that point I believe the intent is that the group will be closed, but with the mailing list kept active.

Ray