Re: [Geopriv] Stephen Farrell's Block on charter-ietf-geojson-00-01: (with BLOCK)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 03 September 2015 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1531B49C6; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmE2-9m-c3uT; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21F7A1B38C2; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 08:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CE4BE47; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:03:21 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jGhs1sFbhX1; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:03:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.42.21.56]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E209BE59; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:03:20 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1441292600; bh=cQ2Y6RIwKWBu3fMg+lPl2sTg3CXivYT8FZiuHb+jcyA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jWQpvSMttERsiMixLbCVTXdggcIfuypLL6mwB3Mte2UVo2EmIIJSmrk0MUZNCi05C HvloSU3xqyc04Gq9sYD49J8cHmIWsVHBQ1kiU1TpF+T156XnOsccAhLln0kWXACVVS Vl098JCrZh3mPDXdcOqgttQvJ1EAZaWEAn8h/Xf0=
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
References: <20150903111519.12341.48799.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFC1CD0-43EE-4F40-A755-C51D610FBD9A@cooperw.in> <55E83CFF.1040508@cs.tcd.ie> <99B958BA-B141-43D0-A7FB-26ABFDFD274A@cooperw.in> <55E848E3.10403@cs.tcd.ie> <88EE4F71-A95D-478B-B38C-B76D12D8873F@cooperw.in> <55E86027.9050903@cs.tcd.ie> <118F4B72-CD5A-4870-9E6D-D348CD6D2CCC@cooperw.in>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <55E86137.4090103@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:03:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <118F4B72-CD5A-4870-9E6D-D348CD6D2CCC@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/NkFYjSOLhAC3oDHSoJT50bBKHbU>
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, dispatch@ietf.org, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Stephen Farrell's Block on charter-ietf-geojson-00-01: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:03:38 -0000

Lovely.

Thanks,
S.

On 03/09/15 16:02, Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Ok, one more try and we’re there I think:
> 
> OLD
> As the WG considers extensibility it will be careful not to
> preclude extensions that would allow GeoJSON objects to become location objects
> unless the group determines such extensibility would be harmful.
> 
> NEW
> Extensions that would allow GeoJSON objects to become location objects are not expected to be defined in the WG. Should that be needed, re-chartering will be required.
> 
>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 7:58 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:
>>
>>
>> Better again. You could maybe add that's not expected to happen
>> during the lifetime of this wg but that'd be fine.
>>
>> S
>>
>> On 03/09/15 15:57, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>> NEW Should extensions that would allow GeoJSON objects to become
>>> location objects be needed, re-chartering will be required.
>