IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 22 October 2014 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82F41A87BB for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tUe-SEtje4yS for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFD091ACD0A for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u10so3387692lbd.1 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cM11zCQ4UV6lmor5xkpn6TXb8Snz9wMZe0cAXBomzBA=; b=EvHYOIcw2HNEfPlYwmkUG2ShP+eW3CE+EcGFsDNfNyGrowHRUeg/AQsmSkjaypHewa AGR9EEu3WVu6QH+oab7sjkwWB9Mhkqs49SHEUrSzfm2+bw2nAZxor32WEu9GoIby4s4B K7hF+oo8lQqN+anDogATGWy1y4MiaoIZmc0YSuer5mldsxgnFC6OrmTeX1j/0bMS87EI fFzcyfDVtGRXd9KyYuxMGJanxrS4JahXYTtr/Wx9l2UwTAkA8b0XVN2sfIrcAiRVNEBD ovNNNvzXodGoYW8KUEOTFpz0AyyO7MeB3DRIUmNZKIV1+CANZnZpu6FBHK0uNe5nDkc8 C7uw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.221.226 with SMTP id qh2mr43686983lbc.5.1414002217199; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.215.217 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B977A97F-1860-4D8B-9D5A-13DA7CB2520E@nominet.org.uk>
References: <54478BCA.6060305@gmx.de> <586D89F0-48CE-4674-ADCF-78C2C0C11939@nominet.org.uk> <5447CEB2.1080905@gmx.de> <B977A97F-1860-4D8B-9D5A-13DA7CB2520E@nominet.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:23:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVyjf=mh0BM0zLSFwAQ0UQyYLAOCNh-2rw8Wh03mto=Yw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/VvK6IaAJ7ZGclrAXGvmFveP_3hM
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty@tools.ietf.org>, "drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:23:41 -0000

Thanks for catching that.  6fc08dd fixes it.

On 22 October 2014 08:44, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 16:35, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-10-22 17:00, Ray Bellis wrote:
>>>
>>> Julian,
>>>
>>> I’m not an XMLNS guru, but isn’t the line at the top reading xmlns:con=“urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv:conf” creating “con” as an alias for that namespace?
>>> ...
>>
>> Good catch (so yes, it's XMLNS-wellformed after all), but that one maps "con" to
>>
>>  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv:conf
>>
>> while the namespace being registered is:
>>
>>   urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:conf
>>
>> So maybe it's just a typo in the namespace registration?
>
> More likely in the example, I think, looking at other recent extensions to PIDF-LO which have used …:ns:geopriv:*
>
> I’ll ensure that the author corrects either the registration or the example accordingly.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email