Re: [Geopriv] Protocol Action: 'Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in PIDF-LO' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04.txt)

And with this, I believe I can declare the Working Group finished and ask our AD to close the group :)

Whilst we're not (of course) meeting as a WG in Honolulu, I think some sort of get-together celebration is in order!

If folks think that's a good idea I'll solicit suggestions for a venue and date/time for such - probably a Doodle poll for the latter.

Kind regards

Ray

On 24 Oct 2014, at 19:12, "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in PIDF-LO'
>  (draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04.txt) as Proposed Standard
> 
> This document is the product of the Geographic Location/Privacy Working
> Group.
> 
> The IESG contact persons are Alissa Cooper and Richard Barnes.
> 
> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Technical Summary
> 
> ## This document describes improved semantics for expressing the 
> ## uncertainty and confidence of a location object and specifies a new 
> ## XML schema for describing these values within a PIDF-LO object per 
> ## Standards Track RFC 4119.
> 
> Working Group Summary
> 
> ## There were concerns over how a civic location might be
> ## "uncertain".  Text was added to clarify that the context
> ## was civic locations that have resulted from reverse-geocoding
> ## measured geodetic locations.
> 
> Document Quality
> 
> ## The document has had good levels of working group review.
> 
> Personnel
> 
> ## The document shepherd is Ray Bellis.
> ## The responsible AD is Alissa Cooper.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv