Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Fri, 24 April 2015 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F23E1B35B0 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TH0NGAYSdNA8 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB69B1B35B7 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so12716011wiz.1 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BALNqaAbjJPVkeFKwM9Nvv7sx/4LBCZZlqRZqDtLGX8=; b=om3C4GO6hQ47BE/XA7y4qeMq12DTtYYImRHr5m/RUJiQhoRzqfh0FLbt2rNMgCw4e2 l4fEfzRHcB3t6pme8Pt/qRU3a94iExiR6MTO2q/UnGCyWqk2CVFcu6S1OpWdk7bHwkUb MQwBJn7UNuZqH5OfwTxF1z4t7hng+n0KhV54p8EzzPDQijY6dla0L6tqp+Smd5Td9KDN 42ur62A1Pu2G0bdhBplDM/zk+wlwHMfL8WZf7lb1Dexr5rIGUqYeN6Ndf74tTwioY0XZ I3Q8l0bOP1VvXodvgTI+XS+MCO8EK9fVc+B94oPFurzymUiqDhFxjXSy02J1yR/0sW6N iiGg==
X-Received: by 10.180.87.199 with SMTP id ba7mr1586191wib.81.1429863394618; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.219.179] ([89.47.193.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xb3sm11340812wjc.38.2015.04.24.01.16.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D337042@fcc.gov>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:16:32 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30BDAF1D-6F50-4053-AA7F-818BD6E68043@gmail.com>
References: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D336F45@fcc.gov> <, > <CABkgnnWcLErqa4b6CGUKgLVuc6HDQFdiR9nFZnzFDX20G=C3YA@mail.gmail.com> <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D337042@fcc.gov>
To: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/fAfXKa-XNjvPL9YtN3SSCJkhndw>
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:16:56 -0000

I guess that this would ensure that location was “valid”, but doesn’t it open the system up to the “Where would I like to be today” issue that is impacting i2 to some extent?
The LIS is supposed to provide some kind of assurances on the location it provides, if it can be independently user-populated it kind of feels like this aspect of the LIS is going away.

Cheers
James



> On 24 Apr 2015, at 8:43 am, Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>; wrote:
> 
> I'm not wedded to the method at all, but that was the only one that seemed close... A validation query via LoST might be a good option (i.e., first LoST, then HELD).
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Martin Thomson [martin.thomson@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 6:32 PM
> To: Henning Schulzrinne
> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data
> 
> On 23 April 2015 at 14:36, Henning Schulzrinne
> <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>; wrote:
>> Can we use a model similar to RFC 7105 for updating user-configured (civic) location data in VoIP scenarios?
> 
> 
> 'twould require definition of a new measurement type that used the
> civic address schema.
> 
> The success response would likely turn into an echo of the address;
> failure would not include the information.  There wouldn't be any way
> to annotate that with extra information about what went wrong in the
> same way that recent additions to LoST might.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv