Re: [Geopriv] WG status update
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 13 October 2014 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F022D1A1B18 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RI84Qxt-nXPP for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560A41A1B45 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b6so6765160lbj.17 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ABFsd7qiRx8HTZlK/du3ekeRFPsP+01qKG1yvGmjpX8=; b=LdzFqhMLnu7pwJpd/0xF413waKFf6G/WlzoZou3pCPTBgb8vdG0Wp4k7i3IoOnBkXr ix7pgGlUGZFBJJG0XhGx8zo4hiUwluAt7QdFM27ghpdrVdOujZ8Lx2QiAncm3JpkEXG0 jgJERbhgJIZgisIyQvRZ9lOJefYPScxiUKC+o2lraSO4q+SXrrxN/vcjkhqJAsUV7OQU A/rtvO1p4LUyG6CexdI66lK/3dNtNp9DNnxSfWkVHvU53kdUGF1titeJQPl4MrQGXNB0 87qrb4CC5qIUQaasdatcQXk3MFxm18WMT/6uzJBiiNpB+Yq8AgOp6mjpIfb2WmwR1MId jfew==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.150.106 with SMTP id uh10mr25144804lbb.11.1413218230559; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.215.217 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <EDBB62E9-6974-43A3-A682-D8F47C58531E@nominet.org.uk>
References: <EDBB62E9-6974-43A3-A682-D8F47C58531E@nominet.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:37:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXXiqDkQVXR5aeR2iqUrTNM8ePVd=_yUVyECgF0pr6oxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/hh7bznNG-cFccduabyx--4NYEd8
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG status update
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:37:14 -0000
On 13 October 2014 02:44, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote: > Just in case anything significant comes up during IESG review my expectation is that we shall keep the WG active until this doc leaves the IESG bound for the RFC Editors. At that point I believe the intent is that the group will be closed, but with the mailing list kept active. That sounds like a good plan.
- [Geopriv] WG status update Ray Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update todd
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update Ray Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update Martin Thomson
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update Richard Barnes