[Geopriv] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7459 (7468)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 28 April 2023 11:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91A0C151527 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jrY34rbD09Zl for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6BEC14CE52 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 88EAB55F69; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: martin.thomson@gmail.com, a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, ray.bellis@nominet.org.uk
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com, geopriv@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230428114501.88EAB55F69@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:45:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/iNPyxagYXljyM16jVh2RNn0P3Qg>
Subject: [Geopriv] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7459 (7468)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 11:45:06 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7459, "Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7468 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com> Section: 7459 Original Text ------------- 7459 Corrected Text -------------- 7459 Notes ----- Solve the issue basic Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7459 (draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04) -------------------------------------- Title : Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Publication Date : February 2015 Author(s) : M. Thomson, J. Winterbottom Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Geographic Location/Privacy Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Geopriv] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7459 (74… RFC Errata System
- [Geopriv] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC745… Randall Gellens