Re: [Geopriv] WG status update
Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 17 October 2014 00:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB501A8707
for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id mDC7p89LuTtc for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com
[209.85.220.182])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 636C41A7D83
for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id la4so3585027vcb.13
for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=yjL50LoK3uRjybhNFh7eW3DiH1wobqZmBFpFD90CGr0=;
b=CRBr/WpckvtckOj7wf6bPJNNrsrLZPHwMt7kd998Q6Lp3IAyKc5A3bBa/hK76FgXS9
thN+fBfTXb0vDlP5BWoQg6P9aNLTlvvVWqOVGnWPv+bdskCOPx9j+8uB6L8c/MoDI4Bp
eZ+AHt44gLcuXPxumx8sBkXHXP2wOxCoiKhE8/rkSURU/XkQVmwyB4GRggP0WR0Heg6G
sNnVLwWU2VSS+Sb/E6sk/SxlBBXmn6//ITuPfxduQW4GmVcNQjwZWmZZFvAj5Mmw1S+Q
gZpWflAugdLYeVbhB3fciGRhLoZ6c5VBGAIwcs8M8pQrOEqQzMOCw1+OGbXM7EHSqtXl
TD7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDtxOnlsJHzNF+PU4Z2394ZCLmcAo/fXr/G0NHH6rq7tHzoP/q2qjdC6cyDpJUt447/89b
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.117.115 with SMTP id kd19mr3805702vdb.54.1413504163447;
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.149.205 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <543BC9D0.1000203@earthlink.net>
References: <EDBB62E9-6974-43A3-A682-D8F47C58531E@nominet.org.uk>
<543BC9D0.1000203@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRd-99-gMweW0MZqFU9j9Awc_ugmaPMn=+FLDB7HN1_XQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: todd <tglassey@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec547c7dd8d1a790505931530
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/nqy__WqEeM-915Yf_d_B1D0G8ZI
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG status update
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>,
<mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>,
<mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:02:47 -0000
Hi Todd, Minutes of recent telechats can be found here: https://www.ietf.org/iesg/minutes/2014/index.html --Richard On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:47 AM, todd <tglassey@earthlink.net> wrote: > Hey Ray are the IESG telechats and the IESG sessions recorded? I.e. is > there any evidence of their operations created and how is this content > stored? I ask this because of - well, you know. > > Todd Glassey > > On 10/13/2014 2:44 AM, Ray Bellis wrote: > >> Just a quick update: >> >> draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty has now completed IETF LC and is now in >> IESG evaluation, on the agenda for this Thursday's IESG telechat. >> >> Just in case anything significant comes up during IESG review my >> expectation is that we shall keep the WG active until this doc leaves the >> IESG bound for the RFC Editors. At that point I believe the intent is that >> the group will be closed, but with the mailing list kept active. >> >> Ray >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geopriv mailing list >> Geopriv@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8378 - Release Date: 10/12/14 >> >> >> > -- > Thanks, > Todd S. Glassey > [Personal Email] > --------------------------- > This email may contain confidential material protected as trade secrets > and the like and as such is by default considered private and confidential > in form. Without the word "PUBLIC:" as the opening tag in the Subject Line > this email is to be considered confidential and may not be reproduced or > excerpted in any form or disclosed to any unauthorized parties in any form; > If this mail was forwarded or incorrectly sent to you please destroy it > immediately. > > > _______________________________________________ > Geopriv mailing list > Geopriv@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv >
- [Geopriv] WG status update Ray Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update todd
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update Ray Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update Martin Thomson
- Re: [Geopriv] WG status update Richard Barnes