Re: [Geopriv] WG status update

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 17 October 2014 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB501A8707 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mDC7p89LuTtc for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 636C41A7D83 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id la4so3585027vcb.13 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yjL50LoK3uRjybhNFh7eW3DiH1wobqZmBFpFD90CGr0=; b=CRBr/WpckvtckOj7wf6bPJNNrsrLZPHwMt7kd998Q6Lp3IAyKc5A3bBa/hK76FgXS9 thN+fBfTXb0vDlP5BWoQg6P9aNLTlvvVWqOVGnWPv+bdskCOPx9j+8uB6L8c/MoDI4Bp eZ+AHt44gLcuXPxumx8sBkXHXP2wOxCoiKhE8/rkSURU/XkQVmwyB4GRggP0WR0Heg6G sNnVLwWU2VSS+Sb/E6sk/SxlBBXmn6//ITuPfxduQW4GmVcNQjwZWmZZFvAj5Mmw1S+Q gZpWflAugdLYeVbhB3fciGRhLoZ6c5VBGAIwcs8M8pQrOEqQzMOCw1+OGbXM7EHSqtXl TD7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDtxOnlsJHzNF+PU4Z2394ZCLmcAo/fXr/G0NHH6rq7tHzoP/q2qjdC6cyDpJUt447/89b
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.117.115 with SMTP id kd19mr3805702vdb.54.1413504163447; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.149.205 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <543BC9D0.1000203@earthlink.net>
References: <EDBB62E9-6974-43A3-A682-D8F47C58531E@nominet.org.uk> <543BC9D0.1000203@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:02:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL02cgRd-99-gMweW0MZqFU9j9Awc_ugmaPMn=+FLDB7HN1_XQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: todd <tglassey@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec547c7dd8d1a790505931530
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/nqy__WqEeM-915Yf_d_B1D0G8ZI
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG status update
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:02:47 -0000

Hi Todd,

Minutes of recent telechats can be found here:
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/minutes/2014/index.html

--Richard

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:47 AM, todd <tglassey@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Hey Ray are the IESG telechats and the IESG sessions recorded? I.e. is
> there any evidence of their operations created and how is this content
> stored? I ask this because of - well, you know.
>
> Todd Glassey
>
> On 10/13/2014 2:44 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
>
>> Just a quick update:
>>
>> draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty has now completed IETF LC and is now in
>> IESG evaluation, on the agenda for this Thursday's IESG telechat.
>>
>> Just in case anything significant comes up during IESG review my
>> expectation is that we shall keep the WG active until this doc leaves the
>> IESG bound for the RFC Editors.  At that point I believe the intent is that
>> the group will be closed, but with the mailing list kept active.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8378 - Release Date: 10/12/14
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Thanks,
> Todd S. Glassey
> [Personal Email]
> ---------------------------
> This email may contain confidential material protected as trade secrets
> and the like and as such is by default considered private and confidential
> in form. Without the word "PUBLIC:" as the opening tag in the Subject Line
> this email is to be considered confidential and may not be reproduced or
> excerpted in any form or disclosed to any unauthorized parties in any form;
> If this mail was forwarded or incorrectly sent to you please destroy it
> immediately.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>