[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 22 October 2014 10:50 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDA21A8FD6
for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ti6m50HGdDu4 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D991A8F3A
for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101)
with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfzEP-1XSPP548cX-00NPpH; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:49:55
+0200
Message-ID: <54478BCA.6060305@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:49:46 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty@tools.ietf.org, GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PArzPxSeRc5ooicu3JH32Yy0+GOFwsdhmGfRuQ7wBpYNkxwbhKx
4HJEsnTtptcfkuw71yj0gM3bFg4zkvUk5aCGhWR+mte4el0B2n1DHyVsQqAWo0p2I5FIn3j
7Rf7a7qwbIoGSh7YvwdQd/FG9JV0XLaE+dIx0ECNPw5Zc1aqWrWOHFsyIBmg32wVXZL+xTV
uZzdRwv6wMpP6pvaHb3vg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/oCZeRd-inB84wMxyA_BXPYA316g
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 07:10:17 -0700
Cc: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
Subject: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>,
<mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>,
<mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:50:01 -0000
Hi there. I was asked to review the XML namespace registration, and I have minor editorial comments. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-03#section-8.1> defines the XML namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:conf" But that namespace name only occurs once more in the document (in the XML schema). It *ought* to appear in <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-03#section-4.1> (where the confidence element is described); alternatively, that section could refer to the schema. Note that <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-03#section-6.4> has the following example: > <pidf:presence > xmlns:pidf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" > xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10" > xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0" > xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml" > xmlns:con="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv:conf" > entity="pres:alice@example.com"> > <dm:device id="sg89ab"> > <pidf:status> > <gp:geopriv> > <gp:location-info> > <gs:Circle srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326"> > <gml:pos>42.5463 -73.2512</gml:pos> > <gs:radius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001"> > 850.24 > </gs:radius> > </gs:Circle> > <!-- c --> <con:confidence pdf="normal">67</con:confidence> > </gp:location-info> > <gp:usage-rules/> > </gp:geopriv> > </pidf:status> > <dm:deviceID>mac:010203040506</dm:deviceID> > </dm:device> > </pidf:presence> That example isn't XMLNS-wellformed, as the "con" namespace is undefined (and yes, that's why I couldn't find it when looking for uses of the newly defined namespace). Best regards, Julian
- [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty Julian Reschke
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty Ray Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty Ray Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty Julian Reschke
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty Martin Thomson