Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data

Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov> Thu, 23 April 2015 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67FF1A8943 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3LpxPtMbt2O for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DC-IP-1.fcc.gov (dc-ip-1.fcc.gov [192.104.54.97]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB4D1A8A17 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D337042@fcc.gov>
From: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data
Thread-Index: AdB+DVAsfrtK/5I1T2CjgnoZPVLhZwAKaPIA//+/iq8=
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:43:08 +0000
References: <E6A16181E5FD2F46B962315BB05962D07D336F45@fcc.gov>, <CABkgnnWcLErqa4b6CGUKgLVuc6HDQFdiR9nFZnzFDX20G=C3YA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWcLErqa4b6CGUKgLVuc6HDQFdiR9nFZnzFDX20G=C3YA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/ocrfBvhBjwNtbB0ibIIEYvc7s4w>
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:43:33 -0000

I'm not wedded to the method at all, but that was the only one that seemed close... A validation query via LoST might be a good option (i.e., first LoST, then HELD).

________________________________________
From: Martin Thomson [martin.thomson@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 6:32 PM
To: Henning Schulzrinne
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] HELD: user-configured data

On 23 April 2015 at 14:36, Henning Schulzrinne
<Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>; wrote:
> Can we use a model similar to RFC 7105 for updating user-configured (civic) location data in VoIP scenarios?


'twould require definition of a new measurement type that used the
civic address schema.

The success response would likely turn into an echo of the address;
failure would not include the information.  There wouldn't be any way
to annotate that with extra information about what went wrong in the
same way that recent additions to LoST might.