Re: [Geopriv] IPv6 geo draft

"Carl Reed" <creed@opengeospatial.org> Wed, 29 October 2014 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <creed@opengeospatial.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79411A01EC for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.722
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OIFnnvpJkHy for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.opengeospatial.org (scale.ogcinc.net [66.244.86.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CBC1A03C7 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.opengeospatial.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC5F941F5; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.ogcinc.net
Received: from mail.opengeospatial.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scale.ogcinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ch2JVfhXd7mS; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.standardsmail.org (mail2.standardsmail.org [66.244.86.41]) by mail.opengeospatial.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE7A941F3; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.standardsmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D554EF6804A; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.standardsmail.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.standardsmail.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id VG3R6Icf92qf; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.standardsmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32D4F6808B; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.standardsmail.org
Received: from mail2.standardsmail.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.standardsmail.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Z1O_-lgwKjeZ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from OfficeHP (c-75-71-122-141.hsd1.co.comcast.net [75.71.122.141]) by mail2.standardsmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EE1CF67CE7; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <E44194C516844597BFBFC2CEDF11B961@OfficeHP>
From: "Carl Reed" <creed@opengeospatial.org>
To: "Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in>, "geopriv mailing list" <geopriv@ietf.org>
References: <63488E50-13DF-4212-A72F-BE060240756D@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <63488E50-13DF-4212-A72F-BE060240756D@cooperw.in>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:11:19 -0600
Organization: OGC
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_070C_01CFF358.4D6C79A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/pljiFODNlfKEycq0CSBSzPo1WNA
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPv6 geo draft
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:11:41 -0000

Alissa -

Thank you for providing this reference. I will need tor read in detail but my quick look raises a question of whether the authors considered Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options for Coordinate-Based Location Configuration Information [RFC 6225]. 6225 is consistent with related work in the OGC and ISO. Further, 6225 is referenced in the NENA i3 operational architecture for NG 911. Would be nice if all of these geo encodings were consistent and harmonized.

I will provide more comments.

Regards

Carl Reed, PhD
CTO
OGC


From: Alissa Cooper Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:52 AM
To: geopriv mailing list 
Subject: [Geopriv] IPv6 geo draft

Folks on this list might have interest in this draft, which has been discussed on the 6man list and will be presented at IETF 91 in 6man: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-skeen-6man-ipv6geo-01.txt 

Alissa


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv