Re: [Geopriv] Protocol Action: 'Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in PIDF-LO' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04.txt)

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Sun, 26 October 2014 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38251A1A94 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWigLWfrjm-7 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE8FA1A1A93 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so4128815pab.40 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=njogSEZu3Efk46IlJDPfILGjbbt8STMKjn92J7P+MFk=; b=V3ruOtu05vAYqEMujwr9XjBc8TbzlO1v8z7dtCsUznesLF7Ch41b3sv1plb0BqRHxH UuYaxHj/LWE5Z+dIxkYQb0uI4e7Fmju2PYElFlS41F6kw8pE167jRM9o2+154Hpu0x53 Cj6dEW4YutbPZpjhKc/gM3GcBmOOERGzn+3wrHClj/S0VdHrtblMUOZIQirr/TYn5kFT C+RaqNxmVCbD3SemH4XX+ebYX2cSXAjMsuVxARJG+IqCgAvJf1CrEIIXxBm2X0IbFzdp 850iWzi535LlFoGF+zMaObmpXpNvc3F18pE1WwZg01XcxP28N6x/1y7Rmkg3RGDBisiV Bsbw==
X-Received: by 10.70.96.227 with SMTP id dv3mr15962191pdb.119.1414355895491; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (124-169-12-96.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.169.12.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tu10sm9074184pab.14.2014.10.26.13.38.14 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20141024181157.10245.34144.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6DB8FD3D-6277-481C-A68D-26F7D569DC55@nominet.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <6DB8FD3D-6277-481C-A68D-26F7D569DC55@nominet.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <34F30DE3-58E2-417D-A5B4-4E6254931034@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201)
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:38:11 +1100
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/geopriv/tSJasmPzjEInzWZp5T0QZd_YWMA
Cc: geopriv mailing list <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Protocol Action: 'Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in PIDF-LO' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 20:38:17 -0000

Have a drink for me!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Oct 2014, at 7:22 am, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> And with this, I believe I can declare the Working Group finished and ask our AD to close the group :)
> 
> Whilst we're not (of course) meeting as a WG in Honolulu, I think some sort of get-together celebration is in order!
> 
> If folks think that's a good idea I'll solicit suggestions for a venue and date/time for such - probably a Doodle poll for the latter.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Ray
> 
>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 19:12, "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The IESG has approved the following document:
>> - 'Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in PIDF-LO'
>> (draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04.txt) as Proposed Standard
>> 
>> This document is the product of the Geographic Location/Privacy Working
>> Group.
>> 
>> The IESG contact persons are Alissa Cooper and Richard Barnes.
>> 
>> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Technical Summary
>> 
>> ## This document describes improved semantics for expressing the 
>> ## uncertainty and confidence of a location object and specifies a new 
>> ## XML schema for describing these values within a PIDF-LO object per 
>> ## Standards Track RFC 4119.
>> 
>> Working Group Summary
>> 
>> ## There were concerns over how a civic location might be
>> ## "uncertain".  Text was added to clarify that the context
>> ## was civic locations that have resulted from reverse-geocoding
>> ## measured geodetic locations.
>> 
>> Document Quality
>> 
>> ## The document has had good levels of working group review.
>> 
>> Personnel
>> 
>> ## The document shepherd is Ray Bellis.
>> ## The responsible AD is Alissa Cooper.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv