Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD
Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Wed, 30 April 2008 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-geopriv-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F4C3A6B72; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44BBE3A6B72 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhpkRiXKCy7X for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (unknown [74.95.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E223A6A71 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (localhost.rtfm.com [127.0.0.1]) by romeo.rtfm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D645081A; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:00:48 -0700
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
In-Reply-To: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF10441BD76@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
References: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF10441BD76@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Message-Id: <20080430150048.67D645081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
Cc: GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>, Mary Barnes <mary.barnes@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
At Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:40:42 -0500, Thomson, Martin wrote: > > I missed this in the changes for -06. Please forgive my ignorance, but > I wasn't there at -71 and it appears that only the conclusion was > captured, not the rationale. The minutes focus on whether there should > be a URI scheme or not, but make what seems (to me) to be a logical > leap: > > Question: Does this HELD: scheme require TLS? Ans: Yes. Then > it needs > to be a HELDS: scheme. > > I don't believe that the letter 's' addresses "concerns over referential > integrity" as stated by the held-06 change-log. So can anyone justify > the above statement? Is there some IETF guideline I don't know of that > states that URI schemes for protocols that use TLS have an extra 's'? No, there's no rule, but it's pretty much the convention. -Ekr _______________________________________________ Geopriv mailing list Geopriv@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
- [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Randall Gellens
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Mary Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Tim Thome
- Re: [Geopriv] The 's' in HELD Winterbottom, James