[GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 in Montreal, looking for volunteers and suggestions
"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01 UTC
Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CDC12016B for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZuSHkC-amvM for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from purple.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (purple.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97963120033 for <ggie@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314858C23D8; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-89-88.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.89.88]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F2818C12FA; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:34 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Battle-Rock: 32b49ccd26c43dcc_1559152894027_2951258790
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1559152894027:2578295095
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1559152894027
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783FE7F5A4; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=hZtuRFKHnoWj6Q 3HgWJ0Mo3W+jI=; b=s4JMLEq8d0zrA8P8aa8gdV3AFzOLK9Ci3k80n6ezKhfaV4 qK2bCi7WcXYDLBO482eTtFES2MdjnDYOnnxvn+wSSdDDHI1YEr6QVdXpvaLGWw1T M10BzoMN3yrZS00wnG/J+eLKOVHgX+DYmz/B9vEYg4ooYKUpq1OJIOLHcmBAc=
Received: from [192.168.129.218] (unknown [69.241.19.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 479277FE61; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a73
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: ggie@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 14:01:08 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <694B8D88-4811-4EC3-BC16-83B37E2EB2D2@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_015B1C17-49ED-4A01-B6A2-6395EB5E338D_="
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddruddvjedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffoffkgggtgfesrgekmherredtjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfnvghslhhivgcuffgrihhglhgvfdcuoehluggrihhglhgvsehthhhinhhkihhnghgtrghtrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepieelrddvgedurdduledruddvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddvledrvddukegnpdhinhgvthepieelrddvgedurdduledruddvpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtoheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/Y7YZHj537Aib2RTXAO9ISoe09wA>
Subject: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 in Montreal, looking for volunteers and suggestions
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items for Glass to Glass Internet Ecosystem of Video Content <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:38 -0000
Hi, We’ve been working with Éric to see about having a “Media OPS” bof in Montreal, and I’ve copied a draft agenda/proposal framework, below. Comments welcome. As the BoF request deadline is approaching, I’d like to get some firm commits on concrete contributions (I-Ds are ideal; presentations are possible). If you have a contribution you’d like to share in the agenda, please let me know; if you’ve already heard from me with a request, I’ll be following up :^) . Media OPerationS (MOPS) BoF Area: OPS Chairs: Leslie Daigle (ldaigle@thinkingcat.com), Glenn Deen (glenn.deen@nbcuni.com) Agenda 0/ Agenda bash 1/ Scope of video on the Internet <contributions solicited> 2/ Video using IETF technologies <contributions solicited; I was thinking that LURK and OpenCache might fit well here, again> 3/ Open questions for IETF and video AOB Full description of BoF: Internet- and Internet-protocol-delivered video/media is popular, leading to significant technology development across industries not traditionally thought of as Internet technology developers or operators, as well as considerable quantities of traffic on local and transit networks. Continued development of Internet-using technologies should be properly coordinated in order to ensure that the existing technologies are well-utilized, and new ones are developed in sympathy with the Internet’s core protocols and design. The purpose of this BoF is to highlight the many existing video activities that are leveraging IETF protocol work, identify gaps in IETF work and/or areas of incompatibility with video technology development efforts being carried out elsewhere, and identify a core group of IETF participants working on video activities across the IETF’s technology areas. Conflicts to avoid: ??? Expected attendance: 40 Length of session: 90min Leslie. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Leslie Daigle Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises ldaigle@thinkingcat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------
- [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 in Mo… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Aaron Falk
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [GGIE] [E] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 1… sanjay.mishra
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [GGIE] [EXTERNAL] Re: Proposing an actual BoF… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Ali C. Begen
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Holland, Jake
- Re: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 i… Ali C. Begen