[GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 in Montreal, looking for volunteers and suggestions

"Leslie Daigle" <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com> Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CDC12016B for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=thinkingcat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZuSHkC-amvM for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from purple.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (purple.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97963120033 for <ggie@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314858C23D8; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-89-88.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.89.88]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F2818C12FA; Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:34 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Battle-Rock: 32b49ccd26c43dcc_1559152894027_2951258790
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1559152894027:2578295095
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1559152894027
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783FE7F5A4; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=thinkingcat.com; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=thinkingcat.com; bh=hZtuRFKHnoWj6Q 3HgWJ0Mo3W+jI=; b=s4JMLEq8d0zrA8P8aa8gdV3AFzOLK9Ci3k80n6ezKhfaV4 qK2bCi7WcXYDLBO482eTtFES2MdjnDYOnnxvn+wSSdDDHI1YEr6QVdXpvaLGWw1T M10BzoMN3yrZS00wnG/J+eLKOVHgX+DYmz/B9vEYg4ooYKUpq1OJIOLHcmBAc=
Received: from [192.168.129.218] (unknown [69.241.19.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ldaigle@thinkingcat.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 479277FE61; Wed, 29 May 2019 11:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a73
From: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
To: ggie@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 14:01:08 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <694B8D88-4811-4EC3-BC16-83B37E2EB2D2@thinkingcat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_015B1C17-49ED-4A01-B6A2-6395EB5E338D_="
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: 0
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddruddvjedguddvvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffoffkgggtgfesrgekmherredtjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfnvghslhhivgcuffgrihhglhgvfdcuoehluggrihhglhgvsehthhhinhhkihhnghgtrghtrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepieelrddvgedurdduledruddvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddvledrvddukegnpdhinhgvthepieelrddvgedurdduledruddvpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpedfnfgvshhlihgvucffrghighhlvgdfuceolhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtoheplhgurghighhlvgesthhhihhnkhhinhhgtggrthdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/Y7YZHj537Aib2RTXAO9ISoe09wA>
Subject: [GGIE] Proposing an actual BoF for IETF 105 in Montreal, looking for volunteers and suggestions
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items for Glass to Glass Internet Ecosystem of Video Content <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 18:01:38 -0000

Hi,

We’ve been working with Éric to see about having a “Media OPS” 
bof in Montreal, and I’ve copied a draft agenda/proposal framework, 
below.   Comments welcome.

As the BoF request deadline is approaching, I’d like to get some firm 
commits on concrete contributions (I-Ds are ideal; presentations are 
possible).   If you have a contribution you’d like to share in the 
agenda, please let me know; if you’ve already heard from me with a 
request, I’ll be following up :^) .





Media OPerationS (MOPS) BoF
Area: OPS
Chairs: Leslie Daigle (ldaigle@thinkingcat.com), Glenn Deen 
(glenn.deen@nbcuni.com)

Agenda

0/ Agenda bash

1/ Scope of video on the Internet
<contributions solicited>

2/ Video using IETF technologies
<contributions solicited; I was thinking that LURK and OpenCache might 
fit well here, again>


3/ Open questions for IETF and video


AOB

Full description of BoF:

Internet- and Internet-protocol-delivered video/media is popular, 
leading to significant technology development across industries not 
traditionally thought of as Internet technology developers or operators, 
as well as considerable quantities of traffic on local and transit 
networks. Continued development of Internet-using technologies should be 
properly coordinated in order to ensure that the existing technologies 
are well-utilized, and new ones are developed in sympathy with the 
Internet’s core protocols and design.

The purpose of this BoF is to highlight the many existing video 
activities that are leveraging IETF protocol work, identify gaps in IETF 
work and/or areas of incompatibility with video technology development 
efforts being carried out elsewhere, and identify a core group of IETF 
participants working on video activities across the IETF’s technology 
areas.



Conflicts to avoid: ???

Expected attendance: 40

Length of session: 90min

Leslie.

-- 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie Daigle
Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------