Re: [GGIE] MOPS - Media Ops BoF request

[Kyle Rose <[e-mail]>]

I think the proposed WG charter looks good, and I am in favor of a BoF.

Video delivery poses a critical set of problems for scalable,
latency-sensitive delivery that aren't covered by other high-bandwidth use
cases, such as software downloads (which can tolerate arbitrarily-high
latency). The IETF has standardized many protocols that would be helpful in
scaling up video content delivery to levels seen with OTA and satellite
broadcast (q.v. Jake's slide deck on multicast), but without all the glue
necessary for deployability of those technologies. As a result, these
technologies have not reached the critical mass required to make for a
viable, self-sustaining ecosystem supporting the needs of content
providers, CDNs, networks, and users. The IETF seems like the right venue
for operators to identify blockers and to respond by developing and
publishing new protocols and best practices.

Thanks,
Kyle

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 12:50 PM Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> IETF105 BoF requests are due this Friday, so now would be good time to
> send your comments on the MOPS BoF draft
>
>
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S4soR8QVjbCa1k1CXS8bCXox_h8-zK6kEsS8_IU4yXI/
>
>
>
> The current draft is an amalgam of the discussions we had at IETF104 and
> feedback from a few ADs, but the more the better so please don’t be shy.
>
>
>
> This is a chance to bring forward, officially the topic of creating an
> group with video expertise at the IETF that can help video problems across
> the great diversity of technical areas that are the IETF.  So I encourage
> you to please take a couple of minutes when you get this email, look at the
> draft and comment back the list your thoughts.
>
>
>
> Even – “it looks good to me”  – is helpful to hear.
>
>
>
> regards
>
> Glenn
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GGIE mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie
>