Re: [GGIE] [EXTERNAL] Re: 20181107-VIG-IETF103-Bangkok.pdf

You have good points. But media touches on so many other organizations,
many of which are not compatible with working with the ietf or irtf rules.
Without their inclusion, success is hard to reach, though.

Certain folks in the ietf community are interested in media but then many
media related people are not even aware of the ietf or irtf.  How do we go
about them?

Glenn has a good point, too. GGIE wants to solve immediate problems. IRTF
does not.

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:11 PM Holland, Jake <jholland@akamai.com> wrote:

> It seems to me that, like many of the research groups, we’re grappling
> with present-day issues on the internet that don’t have a known good
> solution, with a lot of contributions on a wide array of relevant topics
> that don’t have another landing place in the IETF (or the IRTF) where
> they’re clearly in-scope.
>
>
>
> Although various actors are trying a lot of things live and planning to
> roll out a lot of things in the near term (standardized or not), there’s a
> lot of unknown space here, and very little confidence (speaking only for
> myself) that the solutions rolled out in the near term are going to be the
> optimal or most widely adopted long-term solutions, as video traffic on the
> internet continue to scale. Even more so if you think about including the
> internet needs for emerging VR-based media.
>
>
>
> I’d argue that in this respect, we’re in a very similar position that a
> bunch of the other research groups are in, specifically including maprg,
> iccrg, t2trg, nmrg, cfrg, and nwcrg.
>
>
>
> I think we saw a taste of the interest level at the first ggie bar-bof
> (the one that got too big to do in a bar), especially with the hum about
> whether problems in this space are worth continuing to discuss at the IETF.
> I bet if we did something like a “Internet Media at Scale Research Group”
> with a charter, we’d see a significant level of buy-in.
>
>
>
> I have no strong opinion on the timing of making an attempt, but it seems
> worthwhile to me to try to put a charter together that people on this list
> more or less agree on and try to get it on the agenda in the context of a
> proposed research group.
>
>
>
> Just my 2c. :)
>
>
>
> -Jake
>
>
>
> *From: *"Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <Glenn.Deen@nbcuni.com>
> *Date: *2018-11-15 at 01:28
> *To: *"Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
> *Cc: *Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "ggie@ietf.org" <
> ggie@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [GGIE] 20181107-VIG-IETF103-Bangkok.pdf
>
>
>
> If we did want to explore that route would would likely need to wait until
> the new IIRTF chair is chosen and seated at IETF104.
>
>
>
> One, Among a few, of my concerns with being in the IRTF is that much of
> what we are talking about is being done in order to do initial deployment
> operationally in the near term (6-18mos) and isn’t research with a lot of
> academics
>
>
>
> I’m sure we could attract academics but they maybe in a space that’s
> research - more abstract and less deplorable.
>
>
>
> Glenn
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Holland, Jake <jholland@akamai.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Thanks for writing this up, Leslie.
>
>
>
> I think there was also a suggestion to turn this video interest meeting
> forum into an IRTF research group, with a few people concurring that it
> seemed like a good idea.
>
>
>
> Is there any interest from people on this list in following up on that
> suggestion?  I think it’s a good idea, and a good fit with the nature of
> the presentations that we’ve seen, and the kinds of problems we’ve been
> grappling with.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Jake
>
>
>
> *From: *Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>
> *Date: *2018-11-14 at 13:52
> *To: *"ggie@ietf.org" <ggie@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[GGIE] 20181107-VIG-IETF103-Bangkok.pdf
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to everyone who joined the discussion last week in Bangkok! Please
> find attached some notes from our session at IETF 103.
>
> Leslie.
>
> --
> ------------------------------
>
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> GGIE mailing list
> GGIE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ggie&d=DwMFAg&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=bqnFROivDo_4iF8Z3R4DyNWKbbMeXr0LOgLnElT1Ook&m=ZCm3lBIfVpi6Z2cEW6eCfwX3avpGPW-AysZNhtIYB_w&s=xrOgH6Y5XRCFFiQspt5USWUDKM8bck1RjQpjBNUooMs&e=>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GGIE mailing list
> GGIE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie
>