Re: [GGIE] Where from here?

"Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media> Fri, 30 November 2018 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ali.begen@networked.media>
X-Original-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ggie@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D6F1274D0 for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:40:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networked-media.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbInAq4uLUGj for <ggie@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72694126DBF for <ggie@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id v10so5896847ios.13 for <ggie@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:40:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networked-media.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1T13tpfBZDG8LI34Fdz6Cbs0EH7hyz8wDlTN4H512Wc=; b=G4wGR+eMIpwOzFKfpm8Y+6h1J2NEtXojI50h/deHZnPr1ba7SzGdaOy+RlqgHJ5NZd bNv0dIh1jmcfe4OpURYIplOMcx7tXcGayukS03ZkbVVaHSW+PhNIF/prD4YB7YUfiQlv QZPF1atDYD6Djz5WVgVkSmbMmZou/p6FMCU/A/paz+qzWsIpmWA1JX++SvsPTroBpodk Sph0sWscwVflEcdV4dlvz9ANjDhm6oXgbKxXXK7IcjuNUfrNflKIR0tu78toUXt0tl6i WGJmD8WIFMyenfMpK/N43TwtYrmwJ5rsntxC9bQXT+OkHochbuHaorlsEt8Dqa6KR0S+ uoig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1T13tpfBZDG8LI34Fdz6Cbs0EH7hyz8wDlTN4H512Wc=; b=W862YAn+lQyLkcC+6A07jENCcogJXAqSkvRHszUrOGQ3tWOB66c7eakGBBQmbanUlz eMba8u2PEATYD8VtuX9ZYSd46znGbibU5l+EZppSZKliX4/OTGzMStW1LoPp1SZ34tOK xuIS57yxf5mbzHEdTqAr5PRQL49/YKBOj7ALoGQKNMy6Sm4+hV/LzufMto7zR6fgK9ss +e9YY5qe6H9D4Yc1N8PwUq34sppT/piLqEi+PvyG/wqhGBLZwjP90LjaqKj2Aj9RVmqi f0yqWXXKona8puteoGO4e2W2vNfafc6KJYCkHqUsYhYFmWvnGe98ekvqKvRJgKUf+suu 35gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWav+73GAgCZFZLibtC4NlK9yNsThgxgHbBlFLskPVAy+ttko8TU vxW//EnnOQGymnteW2ACb2Kp6h1/uBz3WyA8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UF9Y9mfqMp5B6Q7oBE27ViH0M/D73NpU/0yJ8YR085HvBOhuPF1B1qYE7iG+veCBXnmLe14A==
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:92d6:: with SMTP id u205mr6713230iod.221.1543621250597; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.152.0.107] (fw800-d-iowa-aurora-co-dnv.comcast.net. [198.178.8.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12sm303221ita.17.2018.11.30.15.40.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:40:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
From: "Ali C. Begen" <ali.begen@networked.media>
In-Reply-To: <3061D1B1-F6E2-4E16-A83A-B984E566078C@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:40:45 -0700
Cc: Leslie Daigle <ldaigle@thinkingcat.com>, "ggie@ietf.org" <ggie@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7F97D492-8DA5-4F2B-BED6-EC98EF8DEA6F@networked.media>
References: <16C0F13D-CBCA-48AE-8292-13D87762F402@thinkingcat.com> <3061D1B1-F6E2-4E16-A83A-B984E566078C@akamai.com>
To: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ggie/xGJ6TXgE4-RmkbWc-5hZu74SRmE>
Subject: Re: [GGIE] Where from here?
X-BeenThere: ggie@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss IETF-related items surfaced in the W3C GGIE Task Force <ggie.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ggie/>
List-Post: <mailto:ggie@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ggie>, <mailto:ggie-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 23:40:53 -0000

> That said, I’m still not convinced that a research group is wrong. I’ll
> link below to a set of papers I’ve encountered over the last few years.
> These papers are trying to solve internet problems for video
> applications, and were not presented at IETF/IRTF.
>  
> Would they have been presented if there were an appropriate research
> group? I don’t know, but I would have liked to see them there.

Would be nice and looking at the papers, I pretty much know all the authors. And except a few, others would not attend the IETF meeting, mostly because they could not. Most universities do not cover trips to meetings like IETF.


> They look
> like research to me, even though they are targeted for immediate
> deployment, and actively deployed in some cases. How many more such are
> there? Which are best? Which ones might be useful to try to standardize?

Almost none of them :) All those papers (including mine) are addressing the adaptation algorithm on the streaming clients, which we decided to keep outside standardization since day 1.